Graph-based and statistical approaches for detecting spectrally variable target materials

In discriminating target materials from background clutter in hyperspectral imagery, one must contend with variability in both. Most algorithms focus on the clutter variability, but for some materials there is considerable variability in the spectral signatures of the target. This is especially the case for solid target materials, whose signatures depend on morphological properties (particle size, packing density, etc.) that are rarely known a priori. In this paper, we investigate detection algorithms that explicitly take into account the diversity of signatures for a given target. In particular, we investigate variable target detectors when applied to new representations of the hyperspectral data: a manifold learning based approach, and a residual based approach. The graph theory and manifold learning based approach incorporates multiple spectral signatures of the target material of interest; this is built upon previous work that used a single target spectrum. In this approach, we first build an adaptive nearest neighbors (ANN) graph on the data and target spectra, and use a biased locally linear embedding (LLE) transformation to perform nonlinear dimensionality reduction. This biased transformation results in a lower-dimensional representation of the data that better separates the targets from the background. The residual approach uses an annulus based computation to represent each pixel after an estimate of the local background is removed, which suppresses local backgrounds and emphasizes the target-containing pixels. We will show detection results in the original spectral space, the dimensionality-reduced space, and the residual space, all using subspace detectors: ranked spectral angle mapper (rSAM), subspace adaptive matched filter (ssAMF), and subspace adaptive cosine/coherence estimator (ssACE). Results of this exploratory study will be shown on a ground-truthed hyperspectral image with variable target spectra and both full and mixed pixel targets.

[1]  Emmett J. Ientilucci,et al.  Target detection assessment of the SHARE 2010/2012 hyperspectral data collection campaign , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[2]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector , 1992 .

[3]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[4]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[5]  A. Hayden,et al.  Determination of trace-gas amounts in plumes by the use of orthogonal digital filtering of thermal-emission spectra. , 1996, Applied optics.

[6]  Lawrence K. Saul,et al.  Think Globally, Fit Locally: Unsupervised Learning of Low Dimensional Manifold , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  L. Saul,et al.  An Introduction to Locally Linear Embedding , 2001 .

[8]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Improved Manifold Coordinate Representations of Large-Scale Hyperspectral Scenes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Charles L. Bennett,et al.  Infrared hyperspectral imaging results from vapor plume experiments , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[10]  David W. Messinger,et al.  The SHARE 2012 data campaign , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  Stanley R. Rotman,et al.  Evaluating backgrounds for subpixel target detection: when closer isn't better , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[12]  E. J. Kelly Performance of an adaptive detection algorithm; rejection of unwanted signals , 1989 .

[13]  David W. Messinger,et al.  An adaptive locally linear embedding manifold learning approach for hyperspectral target detection , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[14]  Yuval Cohen,et al.  Subpixel hyperspectral target detection using local spectral and spatial information , 2012 .

[15]  James Theiler,et al.  Regression framework for background estimation in remote sensing imagery , 2013, 2013 5th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).

[16]  I. Reed,et al.  Rapid Convergence Rate in Adaptive Arrays , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[17]  Xiaoli Yu,et al.  Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[18]  Li Ma,et al.  Exploring Nonlinear Manifold Learning for Classification of Hyperspectral Data , 2011 .

[19]  S. Rotman,et al.  Spatial-spectral filtering for the detection of point targets in multi- and hyperspectral data , 2005 .

[20]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  The adaptive coherence estimator: a uniformly most-powerful-invariant adaptive detection statistic , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  Alan P. Schaum,et al.  Enough with the additive target model , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[22]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Optical Remote Sensing , 2011 .

[23]  Amanda K. Ziemann A manifold learning approach to target detection in high-resolution hyperspectral imagery , 2015 .

[24]  James Theiler,et al.  Beyond the adaptive matched filter: nonlinear detectors for weak signals in high-dimensional clutter , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[25]  C. Gittins,et al.  Detection and characterization of chemical vapor fugitive emissions by nonlinear optimal estimation: theory and simulation. , 2009, Applied optics.

[26]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Applying nonlinear manifold learning to hyperspectral data for land cover classification , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[27]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Exploiting manifold geometry in hyperspectral imagery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  L.L. Scharf,et al.  Adaptive matched subspace detectors and adaptive coherence estimators , 1996, Conference Record of The Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[29]  Yin-Fong Su,et al.  Quantitative reflectance spectra of solid powders as a function of particle size. , 2015, Applied optics.

[30]  M. Montes,et al.  Manifold learning techniques for the analysis of hyperspectral ocean data , 2005 .

[31]  S.R. Rotman,et al.  Improved covariance matrices for point target detection in hyperspectral data , 2008, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronics Systems.

[32]  James Theiler,et al.  Symmetrized regression for hyperspectral background estimation , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[33]  Marcus S. Stefanou,et al.  Analysis of false alarm distributions in the development and evaluation of hyperspectral point target detection algorithms , 2007 .

[34]  David W. Messinger,et al.  Hyperspectral target detection using graph theory models and manifold geometry via an adaptive implementation of locally linear embedding , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[35]  Yuval Cohen,et al.  Evaluating Subpixel Target Detection Algorithms in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2012, J. Electr. Comput. Eng..

[36]  James Theiler,et al.  Right spectrum in the wrong place: a framework for local hyperspectral anomaly detection , 2016, Computational Imaging.

[37]  A. Fraser,et al.  Characterizing non-Gaussian clutter and detecting weak gaseous plumes in hyperspectral imagery , 2005 .