Limited Rationality in Action: Decision Support for Military Situation Assessment

Information is a force multiplier. Knowledge of the enemy's capability and intentions may be of far more value to a military force than additional troops or firepower. Situation assessment is the ongoing process of inferring relevant information about the forces of concern in a military situation. Relevant information can include force types, firepower, location, and past, present and future course of action. Situation assessment involves the incorporation of uncertain evidence from diverse sources. These include photographs, radar scans, and other forms of image intelligence, or IMINT; electronics intelligence, or ELINT, derived from characteristics (e.g., wavelength) of emissions generated by enemy equipment; communications intelligence, or COMINT, derived from the characteristics of messages sent by the enemy; and reports from human informants (HUMINT). These sources must be combined to form a model of the situation. The sheer volume of data, the ubiquity of uncertainty, the number and complexity of hypotheses to consider, the high-stakes environment, the compressed time frame, and deception and damage from hostile forces, combine to present a staggeringly complex problem. Even if one could formulate a decision problem in reasonable time, explicit determination of an optimal decision policy exceeds any reasonable computational resources. While it is tempting to drop any attempt at rational analysis and rely purely on simple heuristics, we argue that this can lead to catastrophic outcomes. We present an architecture for a ``complex decision machine'' that performs rational deliberation to make decisions in real time. We argue that resource limits require such an architecture to be grounded in simple heuristic reactive processes. We thus argue that both simple heuristics and complex decision machines are required for effective decision making in real time for complex problems. We describe an implementation of our architecture applied to the problem of military situation assessment.

[1]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Bayesian benchmarks for fast and frugal heuristics , 1999 .

[2]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  A Robust Layered Control Syste For A Mobile Robot , 2022 .

[3]  Matthew L. Ginsberg.  Ginsberg Replies of Chapman and Schoppers - Universal Planning Research: A Good or Bad Idea? , 1989, AI Mag..

[4]  Babu Joseph,et al.  A blackboard architecture for model-based reasoning and plan refinement in real-time process control , 1992 .

[5]  Allen Newell,et al.  SOAR: An Architecture for General Intelligence , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[6]  David J. Israel,et al.  Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning , 1988, Comput. Intell..

[7]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Reflection and Action Under Scarce Resources: Theoretical Principles and Empirical Study , 1989, IJCAI.

[8]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Network fragments , 1999 .

[9]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[10]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[11]  B. D'Ambrosio,et al.  Constrained rational agency , 1990, 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings.

[12]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[13]  Gary Klein,et al.  The effect of acute stressors on decision making. , 1996 .

[14]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  The dynamic structure of everyday life , 1988 .

[15]  James Llinas,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion , 1990 .

[16]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[17]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Principles of Metareasoning , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Stanley J. Rosenschein,et al.  Synthesizing Information-Tracking Automata from Environment Descriptions , 1989, KR.

[19]  David Heckerman,et al.  Probabilistic similarity networks , 1991, Networks.

[20]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Constructing Situation Specific Belief Networks , 1998, UAI.

[21]  D. L. Hall,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion , 1992 .

[22]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Trial by Fire: Understanding the Design Requirements for Agents in Complex Environments , 1989, AI Mag..

[23]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Network Engineering for Complex Belief Networks , 1996, UAI.

[24]  Michael Schmitt,et al.  Simplicity and Robustness of Fast and Frugal Heuristics , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[25]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Influence Diagrams , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[26]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Network Fragments: Representing Knowledge for Constructing Probabilistic Models , 1997, UAI.

[27]  Alan D Samples,et al.  SOAR Architecture , 1985 .

[28]  Ferdinand Foch,et al.  The Principles Of War , 1970 .

[29]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[30]  Firooz A. Sadjadi.  Selected Papers on Sensor and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[31]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Real-Time Expert System Interfaces, Cognitive Processes, and Task Performance: An Empirical Assessment , 1993, Human factors.

[32]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .