Correlation and Independence in the Neural Code

The decoding scheme of a stimulus can be different from the stochastic encoding scheme in the neural population coding. The stochastic fluctuations are not independent in general, but an independent version could be used for the ease of decoding. How much information is lost by using this unfaithful model for decoding? There are discussions concerning loss of information (Nirenberg & Latham, 2003; Schneidman, Bialek, & Berry, 2003). We elucidate the Nirenberg-Latham loss from the point of view of information geometry.

[1]  Si Wu,et al.  Population Coding with Correlation and an Unfaithful Model , 2001, Neural Computation.

[2]  Sheila Nirenberg,et al.  Decoding neuronal spike trains: How important are correlations? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Latham,et al.  Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes, Revisited , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Methods of information geometry , 2000 .