Elsevier Editorial System(tm) for Journal of Memory and Language Manuscript Draft Title: Differentiating the Differentiation Models: a Comparison of the Retrieving Effectively from Memory Model (rem) and the Subjective Likelihood Model (slim) Differentiating the Differentiation Models: a Comparison

[1]  A. Criss The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect , 2006 .

[2]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  List discrimination in associative recognition and implications for representation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[5]  John T Wixted,et al.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Barbara L. Chalfonte,et al.  Sum-Difference Theory of Remembering and Knowing : A Two-Dimensional Signal-Detection Model By : , 2004 .

[8]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: a comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). , 2004, Psychological review.

[9]  J. Dunn Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[10]  Jocelyn E. Holden,et al.  Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Turning up the noise or turning down the volume? On the nature of the impairment of episodic recognition memory by midazolam. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Assessing model mimicry using the parametric bootstrap , 2004 .

[13]  A. Criss THE REPRESENTATION OF SINGLE ITEMS AND ASSOCIATIONS IN EPISODIC MEMORY , 2004 .

[14]  B. Murdock The mirror effect and the spacing effect , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  M. Steyvers,et al.  The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  L. Reder,et al.  A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition , 2003 .

[17]  M. Mintzer Triazolam-induced amnesia and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory: Support for a dual process account , 2003 .

[18]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect , 2002 .

[19]  L. T. DeCarlo Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[20]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Feature frequency effects in recognition memory , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[21]  David A. Balota,et al.  The Word-Frequency Mirror Effect in Young, Old, and Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Two Processes in Episodic Recognition Performance , 2002 .

[22]  Michael Wilson MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[23]  David Smith,et al.  Judgments of Frequency and Recency in a Distributed Memory Model. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[24]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification. , 2001, Psychological review.

[26]  W P Banks,et al.  Recognition and Source Memory as Multivariate Decision Processes , 2000, Psychological science.

[27]  I. J. Myung,et al.  GUEST EDITORS' INTRODUCTION: Special Issue on Model Selection , 2000 .

[28]  N. Chater,et al.  Rational models of cognition , 1998 .

[29]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. , 1998, Psychological review.

[31]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Discriminating alternative conceptions of false recognition: The cases of word concreteness and word frequency. , 1997 .

[32]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  J. D. Balakrishnan,et al.  Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[35]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Decision processes in recognition memory: criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Robert L. Goldstone The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[38]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[39]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[40]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength Effect: Ii. Theoretical Mechanisms , 1990 .

[41]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Ray Pike,et al.  Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. , 1989 .

[44]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[45]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[46]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[47]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[48]  R. Nosofsky American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[49]  B. Murdock A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[50]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[51]  Felicia A. Huppert,et al.  Recognition Memory in Amnesic Patients: Effect of Temporal Context and Familiarity of Material , 1976, Cortex.

[52]  A. J. Flexser,et al.  How frequency affects recency judgments: a model for recency discrimination. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[54]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Orthographic Distinctiveness as a Variable in Word Recognition. , 1972 .

[55]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[56]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .