Perceived size and perceived distance in stereoscopic vision and an analysis of their causal relations

Effects of visual angle and convergence upon the perceived sizes and perceived distances of a familiar object (playing card) and a nonrepresentational object (blank white card) were investigated by means of a projector stereoscope with polarizing filters. The results obtained with six Ss indicated that size estimates increased nearly proportionally as the visual angle increased and decreased nearly linearly as the convergence increased. Distance estimates decreased nearly linearly as either the visual angle or the convergence increased. The ratio of the size estimate to the distance estimate for a given visual angle was almost constant irrespective of convergence. In this sense, the size-distance invariance hypothesis held. No clear effect of familiarity was found. Partial correlations were used to discriminate direct and indirect causal relationships between the stimulus variables and perceptual estimates. Both perceived size and perceived distance were found to be determined directly by the two stimulus variables, but to be mutually related only indirectly.

[1]  Baird Jc.  Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  W. H. Ittelson,et al.  The size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1953, Psychological review.

[3]  H. Simon,et al.  Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation* , 1954 .

[4]  Jacob Nachmias,et al.  The Effect of Oculomotor Adjustments on Apparent Size , 1959 .

[5]  The constancies in perceptual theory. , 1951 .

[6]  Hans Wallach,et al.  The use of size matching to demonstrate the effectiveness of accommodation and convergence as cues for distance , 1971 .

[7]  William Epstein,et al.  Does retinal size have a unique correlate in perceived size? , 1969 .

[8]  W. Epstein.  The known-size-apparent-distance hypothesis. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  J. M. Foley.  Depth, size and distance in stereoscopic vision , 1968 .

[10]  PERCEIVED SIZE-RATIO IN STEREOSCOPIC VISION AS A FUNCTION OF CONVERGENCE, BINOCULAR DISPARITY AND LUMINANCE , 1967 .

[11]  W. H. Ittelson.  Size as a cue to distance: static localization. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  C. Slack.  Familiar size as a cue to size in the presence of conflicting cues. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  S. Iwawaki,et al.  Role of convergence and binocular disparity in size constancy , 1972, Psychologische Forschung.

[14]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[15]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The Effect of Convergence on Perceived Size and Distance , 1962 .

[16]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Convergence as a Determiner of Perceived Absolute Size , 1962 .

[17]  W C Gogel,et al.  The sensing of retinal size. , 1969, Vision research.

[18]  H. Leibowitz,et al.  Role of changes in accommodation and convergence in the perception of size. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[19]  W. Epstein,et al.  The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  W C Gogel,et al.  Directional separation and the size cue to distance , 1971, Psychologische Forschung.

[21]  Hubert M. Blalock,et al.  Four-Variable Causal Models and Partial Correlations , 1962, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  William Epstein,et al.  Size and distance judgments under reduced conditions of viewing , 1969 .

[23]  W. R. Biersdorf,et al.  The effect of instructions and oculomotor adjustments on apparent size. , 1963, The American journal of psychology.

[24]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to absolute distance. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[25]  H. Ono,et al.  Change in convergence and retinal disparities as an explanation for the wallpaper phenomenon. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The validity of the size-distance invariance hypothesis with cue reduction , 1971 .

[27]  T. G. Hermans,et al.  The relationship of convergence and elevation changes to judgments of size. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Sverre O. Lie.  Convergence as a cue to perceived size and distance , 1965 .

[29]  Harold Alfred Swenson,et al.  The Relative Influence of Accommodation and Convergence in the Judgment of Distance , 1932 .