Hydrodynamic and Radiographic Toolbox (HART)

With a multi-lab and university team, we propose to develop new methods for a Hydrodynamic and Radiographic Toolbox (HART) that will enable a fuller and more extensive use of experimental radiographic data towards better characterizing and reducing uncertainties in predictive modeling of weapons performance. We will achieve this by leveraging recent developments in areas of computational imaging, statistical and machine learning, and reduced order modeling of hydrodynamics. In terms of software practices, by partnering with XCP (RISTRA Project) we will conform to recent XCP standards that are inline with modern software practices and standards and ensure compatibility and ease of inter-operability with existing codes. Three new activities under this proposal include (a) the development and use of deep learning-based surrogates to accelerate reconstruction and variational inference of density fields from radiographs of hydrotests, (b) a model-data fusion strategy that couples deep learning-based density reconstructions with fast hydrodynamics simulators to better constrain the reconstruction, and (c) a method for treating asymmetries using techniques adopted from limited view tomography. All three new activities will be based on improved treatment of scatter, noise, beam spot movement, detector blur, and flat fielding in the forward model, and a use of sophisticated priors to aid in the re construction. The improvements to the forward model and improved algorithmic design of the reconstruction when complete will be contained in the iterative reconstruction code SHIVA—a code project that we have recently initiated. The many ways in which machine learning can be used in the reconstruction work will be contained in a code HERMES that has been initiated with DTRA support. For example, the significant levels of acceleration that will likely be achieved by the use of machine learning techniques will permit us (and are required) to quantify uncertainties in density retrievals. Next, the two-way coupling between density reconstruction and model-based simulation of the hydrodynamics will be contained in code EREBUS, and will permit a fuller realization of the potential of the data to constrain the hydrodynamic model and better address issues related to asymmetries in the problem. Finally, we anticipate that the better consistency with physics achieved in our reconstructions will allow them to be used by X-Division more so than today.

[1]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Optimization Methods for Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction: Key Models and Optimization Algorithms , 2020, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[2]  Jian Fu,et al.  A deep learning reconstruction framework for X-ray computed tomography with incomplete data , 2019, PloS one.

[3]  M. Klasky A Correct Flat Field Model For DARHT , 2019 .

[4]  Daniel Livescu,et al.  Leveraging Bayesian analysis to improve accuracy of approximate models , 2019, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  A Cone-Beam X-Ray CT Data Collection Designed for Machine Learning , 2019, ArXiv.

[6]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Image Restoration and Reconstruction using Targeted Plug-and-Play Priors , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[7]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Convolutional Analysis Operator Learning: Dependence on Training Data , 2019, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  Rebecca Willett,et al.  Neumann Networks for Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2019, ArXiv.

[9]  Brendt Wohlberg,et al.  An Online Plug-and-Play Algorithm for Regularized Image Reconstruction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[10]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Learning Filter Bank Sparsifying Transforms , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[11]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Adaptive Restart of the Optimized Gradient Method for Convex Optimization , 2017, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[12]  Xiaoqiang Luo,et al.  An Image Reconstruction Method Based on Total Variation and Wavelet Tight Frame for Limited-Angle CT , 2018, IEEE Access.

[13]  Daniël M Pelt,et al.  A mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network for image analysis , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Heye Zhang,et al.  Reweighted Anisotropic Total Variation Minimization for Limited-Angle CT Reconstruction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  Dong Liang,et al.  An improved statistical iterative algorithm for sparse-view and limited-angle CT image reconstruction , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Multi-Scale Wavelet Domain Residual Learning for Limited-Angle CT Reconstruction , 2017, ArXiv.

[17]  Michael Unser,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Compressed Sensing CT Reconstruction via Persistent Homology Analysis , 2016, ArXiv.

[20]  Andreas K. Maier,et al.  Deep Learning Computed Tomography , 2016, MICCAI.

[21]  Jiayu Zhou,et al.  Asynchronous Multi-task Learning , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).

[22]  David M. Blei,et al.  Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians , 2016, ArXiv.

[23]  Ming Yan,et al.  ARock: an Algorithmic Framework for Asynchronous Parallel Coordinate Updates , 2015, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[25]  Igor Mezic,et al.  On applications of the spectral theory of the Koopman operator in dynamical systems and control theory , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[26]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  A Data–Driven Approximation of the Koopman Operator: Extending Dynamic Mode Decomposition , 2014, Journal of Nonlinear Science.

[27]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications , 2013, 1312.0041.

[28]  Brendt Wohlberg,et al.  Plug-and-Play priors for model based reconstruction , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing.

[29]  Laurent Hascoët,et al.  The Tapenade automatic differentiation tool: Principles, model, and specification , 2013, TOMS.

[30]  Klaus Diepold,et al.  Analysis Operator Learning and its Application to Image Reconstruction , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  Iterative CT Reconstruction Using Shearlet-Based Regularization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[32]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Low-Dose X-ray CT Reconstruction via Dictionary Learning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  H. Makaruk Generalization of inverse Abel transform 3D objects reconstruction from single radiographs for selected cases not fulfilling the axial symmetry assumption , 2012 .

[34]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  An ADMM Algorithm for a Class of Total Variation Regularized Estimation Problems , 2012, 1203.1828.

[35]  Daniel J. Tward,et al.  Series of 4D adult XCAT phantoms for imaging research and dosimetry , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[36]  Hiêp Quang Luong,et al.  Augmented Lagrangian based reconstruction of non-uniformly sub-Nyquist sampled MRI data , 2011, Signal Process..

[37]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Analysis operator learning for overcomplete cosparse representations , 2011, 2011 19th European Signal Processing Conference.

[38]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[39]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  MR Image Reconstruction From Highly Undersampled k-Space Data by Dictionary Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  H. Makaruk 3D perturbation of the inverse Abel transform , 2011 .

[41]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  Dictionary Learning , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[42]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  AutoMap User's Guide 2011 , 2011 .

[43]  J. M. Sanz-Serna,et al.  Optimal tuning of the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm , 2010, 1001.4460.

[44]  P. Schmid,et al.  Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[45]  I. Mezić,et al.  Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[46]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[47]  E. Sidky,et al.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  Robert Cierniak,et al.  A New Approach to Image Reconstruction from Projections Using a Recurrent Neural Network , 2008, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[49]  Thierry Blu,et al.  SURE-LET Multichannel Image Denoising: Interscale Orthonormal Wavelet Thresholding , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[50]  Jie Tang,et al.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets. , 2008, Medical physics.

[51]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing - The Sparse Way, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[52]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[53]  Viktor K. Decyk,et al.  UPIC: A framework for massively parallel particle-in-cell codes , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[54]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  AutoMap User's Guide , 2006 .

[55]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[56]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[57]  E. Candès,et al.  New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities , 2004 .

[58]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Wavelet denoising by recursive cycle spinning , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[59]  G. Caporaso,et al.  Status of the dual axis radiographic hydrodynamics test (DARHT) facility , 2002, 2002 14th International Conference on High-Power Particle Beams (BEAMS).

[60]  D. Rovang,et al.  Coupled particle-in-cell and Monte Carlo transport modeling of intense radiographic sources , 2002 .

[61]  J. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[62]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Operation of the Bayes Inference Engine , 1999 .

[63]  Christian H. Bischof,et al.  ADIC: an extensible automatic differentiation tool for ANSI‐C , 1997, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[64]  Klaus Mueller,et al.  The weighted-distance scheme: a globally optimizing projection ordering method for ART , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[65]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  THE BAYES INFERENCE ENGINE , 1996 .

[66]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[67]  D. L. Book,et al.  The Sedov self-similar point blast solutions in nonuniform media , 1994 .

[68]  David W. Juedes,et al.  A taxonomy of automatic differentiation tools , 1991 .

[69]  J. M. McGlaun,et al.  CTH: A three-dimensional shock wave physics code , 1990 .

[70]  M. Bertero Linear Inverse and III-Posed Problems , 1989 .

[71]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[72]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[73]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[74]  A. Kak,et al.  Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm , 1984, Ultrasonic imaging.

[75]  Y. Nesterov A method for unconstrained convex minimization problem with the rate of convergence o(1/k^2) , 1983 .

[76]  David S. Kershaw,et al.  LASNEX code for inertial confinement fusion , 1977 .

[77]  B. F. Logan,et al.  The Fourier reconstruction of a head section , 1974 .

[78]  Martin J. Berger,et al.  Penetration and Diffusion of X Rays , 1959 .

[79]  B. O. Koopman,et al.  Hamiltonian Systems and Transformation in Hilbert Space. , 1931, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.