The Context Effect: The Relationship Between Stimulus Preexposure and Environmental Preexposure Determines Subsequent Learning.

Perceptual learning studies indicate that stimulus preexposure enhances subsequent learning, while latent inhibition studies indicate that stimulus preexposure retards subsequent learning. An analysis of the two paradigms suggests that predictions in regard to the effects of stimulus preexposure must take into account not only the novelty of the stimulus, but the relationship of that novelty to that of the environment at the time of testing. Two studies with identical designs, one with children and one with rats, are reported. In both studies, enhancement of learning is achieved when a new stimulus is presented in an old environment or an old stimulus in a new environment as compared to either a new stimulus in a new environment or • an old stimulus in an old environment. This demonstrates latent inhibition and perceptual learning, and shows that the direction of the effects of stimulus preexposure is dependent on the relative novelty of the environment. A two-process theory based on enhancing salience through conditioning and arousal is proposed to account for the pattern of results.

[1]  R. Lubow Latent Inhibition as a Means of Behavior Prophylaxis , 1973, Psychological reports.

[2]  R. Lubow,et al.  Behavioral decrement following stimulus preexposure: effects of number of preexposures, presence of a second stimulus, and interstimulus interval in children and adults. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  A Comparison of Olfactory and Visual Cue Utilization in Laboratory Rats , 1972 .

[4]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  CS habituation produces a “latent inhibition effect” but no active “conditioned inhibition” , 1972 .

[5]  D. Kahneman Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[6]  Alma E. Lantz Effect of number of trials, interstimulus interval, and dishabituation during CS habituation on subsequent conditioning in a CER paradigm , 1973 .

[7]  R. Oswalt Relationship between level of visual pattern difficulty during rearing and subsequent discrimination in rats. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  R. Rescorla Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. , 1971, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  G. Grice,et al.  The generalization of an instrumental response to stimuli varying in the size dimension. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Anderson Dc,et al.  Variations in intensity, interstimulus interval, and interval between preconditioning CS exposures and conditioning with rats. , 1972 .

[11]  E. Gibson,et al.  The effect of prolonged exposure to visually presented patterns on learning to discriminate them. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[12]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[13]  R. Lubow,et al.  Latent inhibition: the effect of nonreinforced pre-exposure to the conditional stimulus. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[14]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Perception and the Conditioned Reflex , 1965 .