Piecewise linear spine for speed-energy efficiency trade-off in quadruped robots

We compare the effects of linear and piecewise linear compliant spines on locomotion performance of quadruped robots in terms of energy efficiency and locomotion speed through a set of simulations and experiments. We first present a simple locomotion system that behaviorally resembles a bounding quadruped with flexible spine. Then, we show that robots with linear compliant spines have higher locomotion speed and lower cost of transportation in comparison with those with rigid spine. However, in linear case, optimal speed and minimum cost of transportation are attained at very different spine compliance values. Moreover, it is verified that fast and energy efficient locomotion can be achieved together when the spine flexibility is piecewise linear. Furthermore, it is shown that the robot with piecewise linear spine is more robust against changes in the load it carries. Superiority of piecewise linear spines over linear and rigid ones is additionally confirmed by simulating a quadruped robot in Webots and experiments on a crawling two-parts robot with flexible connection.

[1]  K. Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Scaling, why is animal size so important? , 1984 .

[2]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Comparing effects of rigid, flexible, and actuated series-elastic spines on bounding gait of quadruped robots , 2013, 2013 First RSI/ISM International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM).

[3]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[4]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Use Your Spine! Effect of Active Spine Movements on Horizontal Impulse and Cost of Transport in a Bounding, Quadruped Robot , 2013 .

[5]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Finding Resonance: Adaptive Frequency Oscillators for Dynamic Legged Locomotion , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  The development and control of a flexible-spine for a human-form robot , 2003, Adv. Robotics.

[7]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals. , 1970, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  Aude Billard,et al.  A Simple, Adaptive Locomotion Toy-System , 2004 .

[9]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Dynamic Stabilisation of the Biped Lucy Powered by Actuators with Controllable Stiffness , 2010, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[10]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Comparison of Mechanical Design and Energy Consumption of Adaptable, Passive-compliant Actuators , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Self-Stabilization and Behavioral Diversity of Embodied Adaptive Locomotion , 2004, Embodied Artificial Intelligence.

[12]  M. Hildebrand.  Motions of the Running Cheetah and Horse , 1959 .

[13]  Julianna M. Gál.  Spinal flexion and locomotor energetics in kangaroo, monkey, and tiger , 1992 .

[14]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses , 1981, Nature.

[15]  Ludovic Righetti,et al.  Pattern generators with sensory feedback for the control of quadruped locomotion , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Self-organized adaptive legged locomotion in a compliant quadruped robot , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[17]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Benefits of an active spine supported bounding locomotion with a small compliant quadruped robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[18]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  A connectionist central pattern generator for the aquatic and terrestrial gaits of a simulated salamander , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Overview of the Lucy Project: Dynamic Stabilization of a Biped Powered by Pneumatic Artificial Muscles , 2008, Adv. Robotics.

[20]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  The design and control of the flexible spine of a fully tendon-driven humanoid "Kenta" , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[22]  Ali Sadeghi,et al.  LEARNING APPROACH TO STUDY EFFECT OF FLEXIBLE SPINE ON RUNNING BEHAVIOR OF A QUADRUPED ROBOT , 2010 .

[23]  M. Hildebrand.  Further Studies on Locomotion of the Cheetah , 1961 .

[24]  M. Chial,et al.  in simple , 2003 .

[25]  Hartmut Geyer,et al.  A Synthesis Method for Compact Nonlinear Springs with Custom Torque-Deflection Profiles and Bandwidth for Series Elastic Actuators , 2013 .

[26]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots: A review , 2008, Neural Networks.

[27]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Parallel stiffness in a bounding quadruped with flexible spine , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[28]  Karl Frederick Leeser.  Locomotion experiments on a planar quadruped robot with articulated spine , 1996 .

[29]  Jessy W. Grizzle,et al.  The Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum as the Hybrid Zero Dynamics of an Asymmetric Hopper , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[30]  A. A. Biewener,et al.  Tendons and Ligaments: Structure, Mechanical Behavior and Biological Function , 2008 .

[31]  C. David Remy,et al.  Optimal exploitation of natural dynamics in legged locomotion , 2011 .

[32]  Majid Nili Ahmadabadi,et al.  Effect of flexible spine on stability of a passive quadruped robot: Experimental results , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[33]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Running in cheetahs, gazelles, and goats: energy cost and limb configuration. , 1974, The American journal of physiology.

[34]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Muscles do more positive than negative work in human locomotion , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.