Hyperspectral target detection using manifold learning and multiple target spectra

Imagery collected from satellites and airborne platforms provides an important tool for remotely analyzing the content of a scene. In particular, the ability to remotely detect a specific material within a scene is of critical importance in nonproliferation and other applications. The sensor systems that process hyperspectral images collect the high-dimensional spectral information necessary to perform these detection analyses. For a d-dimensional hyperspectral image, however, where d is the number of spectral bands, it is common for the data to inherently occupy an m-dimensional space with m ≪ d. In the remote sensing community, this has led to recent interest in the use of manifold learning, which seeks to characterize the embedded lower-dimensional, nonlinear manifold that the data discretely approximate. The research presented here focuses on a graph theory and manifold learning approach to target detection, using an adaptive version of locally linear embedding that is biased to separate target pixels from background pixels. This approach incorporates multiple target signatures for a particular material, accounting for the spectral variability that is often present within a solid material of interest.

[1]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  The adaptive coherence estimator: a uniformly most-powerful-invariant adaptive detection statistic , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Manifold Learning Theory and Applications , 2011 .

[3]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[4]  Brian J. Daniel,et al.  Continuum fusion methods of spectral detection , 2012 .

[5]  D. West Introduction to Graph Theory , 1995 .

[6]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[7]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications , 2003 .

[8]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[9]  L.L. Scharf,et al.  Adaptive coherence estimation for radar signal processing , 1996, Conference Record of The Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[10]  Tanya L. Myers,et al.  Infrared reflectance spectra: effects of particle size, provenance and preparation , 2014, Security and Defence.

[11]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Is there a best hyperspectral detection algorithm? , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  David W. Messinger,et al.  An adaptive k-nearest neighbor graph building technique with applications to hyperspectral imagery , 2014, 2014 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW).

[13]  David W. Messinger,et al.  The SHARE 2012 data campaign , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[14]  A. Hayden,et al.  Determination of trace-gas amounts in plumes by the use of orthogonal digital filtering of thermal-emission spectra. , 1996, Applied optics.

[15]  Lawrence K. Saul,et al.  Think Globally, Fit Locally: Unsupervised Learning of Low Dimensional Manifold , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Applying nonlinear manifold learning to hyperspectral data for land cover classification , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[17]  Yin-Fong Su,et al.  Quantitative reflectance spectra of solid powders as a function of particle size. , 2015, Applied optics.

[18]  David W. Messinger,et al.  An adaptive locally linear embedding manifold learning approach for hyperspectral target detection , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[19]  Alan P. Schaum,et al.  The affine matched filter , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  I. Reed,et al.  Rapid Convergence Rate in Adaptive Arrays , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[21]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps and Spectral Techniques for Embedding and Clustering , 2001, NIPS.

[22]  M. Montes,et al.  Manifold learning techniques for the analysis of hyperspectral ocean data , 2005 .

[23]  David W. Messinger,et al.  Metrics of spectral image complexity with application to large area search , 2012 .

[24]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  James Theiler,et al.  Confusion and clairvoyance: some remarks on the composite hypothesis testing problem , 2012, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[26]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[27]  David W. Messinger,et al.  Commute time distance transformation applied to spectral imagery and its utilization in material clustering , 2012 .

[28]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[29]  A. Fraser,et al.  Characterizing non-Gaussian clutter and detecting weak gaseous plumes in hyperspectral imagery , 2005 .

[30]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Improved Manifold Coordinate Representations of Large-Scale Hyperspectral Scenes , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[31]  Stefania Matteoli,et al.  An Overview of Background Modeling for Detection of Targets and Anomalies in Hyperspectral Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[32]  Melba M. Crawford,et al.  Selection of Landmark Points on Nonlinear Manifolds for Spectral Unmixing Using Local Homogeneity , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[33]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Taxonomy of detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2005 .

[34]  Amanda K. Ziemann A manifold learning approach to target detection in high-resolution hyperspectral imagery , 2015 .

[35]  David W. Messinger,et al.  Spatially Adaptive Hyperspectral Unmixing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.