An empirical analysis of microblogging behavior in the enterprise

Popular social networking sites have revolutionized the way people interact on the Web. Researchers have studied social networks from numerous perspectives, mostly focusing on publicly available online social networks and microblogging sites, where interactions are in general informal. Enterprises, however, have recently being adopting and utilizing microblogging services as part of their day to day operations. Within an enterprise, microblogging behavior is bounded by main business and work culture, work practices, and everyday problems. Thus, content is formal (although exchanged in an informal setting), less noisy than in online social networks, and emphasizes on the business perspective. The goal of this paper is to study the topological properties of a corporate microblogging service, its dynamics and characteristics, and the interplay between its social and topical components. Through an extensive analysis of enterprise microblogging data, we provide insights on the structural properties of the extracted network of directed messages sent between users of a corporate microblogging service, as well as the lexical and topical alignment of users. We study homophily, finding a substantial level of alignment with respect to the network structure and users activity, as well as latent topical similarity and link probability. Our analysis suggests that users with strong local topical alignment tend to participate in focused interactions, whereas users with disperse interests contribute to multiple discussions, broadening the diversity of participants. We compare our results to traditional, general purpose, online social networks and discuss the implications of our findings.

[1]  Eva Zangerle,et al.  Using Tag Recommendations to Homogenize Folksonomies in Microblogging Environments , 2011, SocInfo.

[2]  Efthimis N. Efthimiadis,et al.  Conversational tagging in twitter , 2010, HT '10.

[3]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Using Lists to Measure Homophily on Twitter , 2012 .

[4]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities , 2007, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07.

[5]  Hongfei Yan,et al.  Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models , 2011, ECIR.

[6]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Structure and evolution of online social networks , 2006, KDD '06.

[7]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[8]  Jun Zhang,et al.  A case study of micro-blogging in the enterprise: use, value, and related issues , 2010, CHI.

[9]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[10]  Ido Guy,et al.  Do you want to know?: recommending strangers in the enterprise , 2011, CSCW.

[11]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  A few chirps about twitter , 2008, WOSN '08.

[12]  Ram Dantu,et al.  Identification of leaders, lurkers, associates and spammers in a social network: context-dependent and context-independent approaches , 2011, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[13]  Anna Wu,et al.  Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site , 2010, CHI.

[14]  Mor Naaman,et al.  HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[15]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  Folks in Folksonomies: social link prediction from shared metadata , 2010, WSDM '10.

[16]  Brian D. Davison,et al.  Empirical study of topic modeling in Twitter , 2010, SOMA '10.

[17]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work , 2009, GROUP.

[18]  Viktor K. Prasanna,et al.  Predicting Communication Intention in Social Networks , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing.

[19]  Peter Loos,et al.  Context-sensitive business process support based on emails , 2012, WWW.

[20]  Dirk Riehle,et al.  Micro-Blogging Adoption in the Enterprise: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[21]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter , 2011, WWW.

[22]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Learning author-topic models from text corpora , 2010, TOIS.

[23]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  W. S. Chow,et al.  Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Microblogging Inside and Outside the Workplace , 2010, ICWSM.

[27]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[28]  Yan Zhao,et al.  Visualization of Communication Patterns in Collaborative Innovation Networks - Analysis of Some W3C Working Groups , 2003, CIKM '03.

[29]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[30]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[31]  Seungyeop Han,et al.  Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services , 2007, WWW '07.

[32]  Hosung Park,et al.  What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? , 2010, WWW '10.

[33]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Want to be Retweeted? Large Scale Analytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network , 2010, 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing.

[34]  Vikrambhai S. Sorathia,et al.  Enterprise Wisdom Captured Socially , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[35]  Tara Matthews,et al.  What Are You Working On? Status Message Q&A in an Enterprise SNS , 2011, ECSCW.

[36]  Eni Mustafaraj,et al.  From Obscurity to Prominence in Minutes: Political Speech and Real-Time Search , 2010 .

[37]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Patterns of temporal variation in online media , 2011, WSDM '11.

[38]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms , 2007, WWW '07.

[39]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Characterizing Microblogs with Topic Models , 2010, ICWSM.

[40]  Viktor K. Prasanna,et al.  Microblogging in the Enterprise: A Few Comments are in Order , 2012, 2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[41]  Dominique Haughton,et al.  A network analysis of an online expertise sharing community , 2012, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[42]  Dirk Riehle,et al.  Modeling Microblogging Adoption in the Enterprise , 2009, AMCIS.

[43]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[44]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The small-world phenomenon: an algorithmic perspective , 2000, STOC '00.

[45]  Munmun De Choudhury,et al.  Tie Formation on Twitter: Homophily and Structure of Egocentric Networks , 2011, SocialCom/PASSAT.

[46]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Lei Shi,et al.  Social Network Analysis in Enterprise , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[48]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.