Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate /r–l/ on the basis of F3 onset frequency?*

Many attempts have been made to teach native Japanese listeners to perceptually differentiate English /r–l/ (e.g. rock–lock). Though improvement is evident, in no case is final performance native English-like. We focused our training on the third formant onset frequency, shown to be the most reliable indicator of /r–l/ category membership. We first presented listeners with instances of synthetic /r–l/ stimuli varying only in F3 onset frequency, in a forced-choice identification training task with feedback. Evidence of learning was limited. The second experiment utilized an adaptive paradigm beginning with non-speech stimuli consisting only of /r/ and /l/ F3 frequency trajectories progressing to synthetic speech instances of /ra–la/; half of the trainees received feedback. Improvement was shown by some listeners, suggesting some enhancement of /r–l/ identification is possible following training with only F3 onset frequency. However, only a subset of these listeners showed signs of generalization of the training effect beyond the trained synthetic context.

[1]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Neural signatures of phonetic learning in adulthood: A magnetoencephalography study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Volume of left Heschl's Gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Keith R. Kluender,et al.  Contributions of nonhuman animal models to understanding human speech perception , 2000 .

[5]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A. Liberman,et al.  An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English , 1975 .

[8]  Naoyuki Takagi,et al.  The limits of training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: eight case studies. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Lotto,et al.  Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E. Knudsen Sensitive Periods in the Development of the Brain and Behavior , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  W Todd Maddox,et al.  Generalizing a neuropsychological model of visual categorization to auditory categorization of vowels , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[13]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The handbook of second language acquisition , 2003 .

[14]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Detection of Sounds in the Auditory Stream: Event-Related fMRI Evidence for Differential Activation to Speech and Nonspeech , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  NON-LINGUISTIC SENTENCE-LENGTH PRECURSORS AFFECT SPEECH PERCEPTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SPEAKER AND RATE NORMALIZATION , 2004 .

[16]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the voicing feature in macaques , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  MAPPING THE TASK FOR THE SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNER: THE CASE OF JAPANESE ACQUISITION OF /R/ AND /L/ , 2004 .

[18]  A. Lotto,et al.  Animal models of speech perception phenomena , 1997 .

[19]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Sensitive and critical periods for visual calibration of sound localization by barn owls , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[21]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[22]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes , 2003, Cognition.

[24]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Joseph D. W. Stephens,et al.  Preceding phonetic context affects perception of nonspeech (L) , 2003 .

[26]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: Acquisition of the English /ð/-/θ/ contrast by francophones , 1986 .

[27]  C. Espy-Wilson Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels /w j r l/ in American English , 1992 .

[28]  Kendall A. King,et al.  AN INTEGRATED VIEW OF LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT: PAPERS IN HONOR OF HENNING WODE , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[29]  J. Flege Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception , 2003 .

[30]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: a comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  A. Lotto,et al.  Effect of Voice Quality on Perceived Height of English Vowels , 1997, Phonetica.

[32]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals , 1981, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[33]  Steven Greenberg,et al.  Listening to Speech : An Auditory Perspective , 2012 .

[34]  J. Flege,et al.  Interactions between the Native and Second-language Phonetic Systems , 2001 .

[35]  A. Lotto,et al.  Cue weighting in auditory categorization: implications for first and second language acquisition. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Joseph D. W. Stephens,et al.  Preceding phonetic context affects perception of nonspeech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  P C Gordon,et al.  Ability in perceiving nonnative contrasts: Performance on natural and synthetic speech stimuli , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. S. Johnson,et al.  Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  P. Kuhl Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Naoyuki Takagi,et al.  The limits of extended naturalistic exposure on the perceptual mastery of English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[41]  J. Morton,et al.  Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life , 2008 .

[42]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[43]  E. Lenneberg Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[44]  P. Iverson,et al.  English /r/-/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  A. Agresti [A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables]: Rejoinder , 1992 .

[46]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Innate Predispositions and the Effects of Experience in Speech Perception: The Native Language Magnet Theory , 1993 .

[47]  R. Raizada,et al.  Quantifying the adequacy of neural representations for a cross-language phonetic discrimination task: prediction of individual differences. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  C. Y. Epsy-Wilson Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels/wjrl/in American English. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production Differences and Similarities , 2010 .

[50]  Tyler K. Perrachione,et al.  Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[51]  William C. Ritchie,et al.  Handbook of second language acquisition , 1999 .

[52]  Virginia A. Mann,et al.  Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of English “l” and “r” , 1986, Cognition.

[53]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  V. Mann,et al.  Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults' perception of / / and /l/. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Reiko Akahane-Yamada,et al.  Perception and production of syllable-initial English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese , 1990, ICSLP.

[57]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[58]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  P. Iverson,et al.  Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: an examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  Effect of massed practice on the comprehension of time-compressed speech. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.

[61]  L Polka,et al.  Trading relations in the perception of /r/-/l/ by Japanese learners of English. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  L Polka,et al.  Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues that differentiate /r/ and /l/. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Categorization and discrimination of nonspeech sounds: differences between steady-state and rapidly-changing acoustic cues. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  A. Liberman,et al.  Acoustic Cues for the Perception of Initial /w, j, r, l/ in English , 1957 .

[65]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Enhanced discriminability at the phonetic boundaries for the place feature in macaques. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Predicting native English-like performance by native Japanese speakers , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[68]  Alan Agresti,et al.  [A Survey of Exact Inference for Contingency Tables]: Rejoinder , 1992 .

[69]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Assessing Individual Differences in Human Behavior: New Concepts, Methods, and Findings , 1995 .

[70]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Success and failure in teaching the [r]-[l] contrast to Japanese adults: Tests of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[71]  Burton S. Rosner,et al.  Discrimination functions predicted from categories in speech and music , 1976 .

[72]  L. Holt Temporally Nonadjacent Nonlinguistic Sounds Affect Speech Categorization , 2005, Psychological science.

[73]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  J. Flege,et al.  An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[75]  Tsuneo Yamada,et al.  Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: the case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/ , 2004, J. Phonetics.