Introduction to Recent Developments in Living Technology

When the scientific and technological fruits of artificial life are embodied in technology with real practical use, sometimes the result can properly be called living technology [6]. Technology today is becoming increasingly lifelike, and there has recently been increasing foundational discussion of the broader scientific, socioeconomic, cultural, and ethical implications of living technology (e.g., [5, 7]). This special issue of Artificial Life describes recent developments in living technology, and samples current progress and applications in the works. The scientific core of the volume consists of seven articles describing new advances toward living technology. The volume also contains four articles about living technologyʼs broader social, ethical, and political implications. Living technology is most simply defined as technology that is alive, but it is convenient to require that such technology furthermore be useful because of being lifelike [6] and not be a simple variant of existing life. We will call something lifelike if it has one or more of lifeʼs characteristic properties. Although there is controversy about the nature of life [4], there is a rough consensus about the characteristic properties exhibited by all typical living beings. Many also agree that a subset

[1]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast , 2006, Nature.

[2]  Takashi Ikegami,et al.  Fatty acid chemistry at the oil-water interface: self-propelled oil droplets. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  Peter R. Wills,et al.  Harnessing Our Very Life , 2013, Artificial Life.

[4]  Rachel Armstrong,et al.  Bütschli Dynamic Droplet System , 2013, Artificial Life.

[5]  Carlos Gershenson,et al.  Living in Living Cities , 2011, Artificial Life.

[6]  David H. Ackley Bespoke Physics for Living Technology , 2013, Artificial Life.

[7]  Steen Rasmussen,et al.  Living Technology: 5 Questions , 2010 .

[8]  D. Stemerding,et al.  Governance Strategies for Living Technologies: Bridging the Gap between Stimulating and Regulating Technoscience , 2013, Artificial Life.

[9]  Mark A. Bedau,et al.  The ethics of protocells : moral and social implications of creating life in the laboratory , 2009 .

[10]  Martin M. Hanczyc,et al.  Metabolism and motility in prebiotic structures , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Takashi Ikegami,et al.  A Design for Living Technology: Experiments with the Mind Time Machine , 2013, Artificial Life.

[12]  Søren Riis,et al.  The Ultimate Technology: The End of Technology and the Task of Nature , 2013, Artificial Life.

[13]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  Living Technology: Exploiting Life's Principles in Technology , 2010, Artificial Life.

[14]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Toward Metabolic Robotics: Insights from Modeling Embodied Cognition in a Biomechatronic Symbiont1 , 2013, Artificial Life.

[15]  Jean-Paul Peronard,et al.  Readiness for Living Technology: A Comparative Study of the Uptake of Robot Technology in the Danish Health-Care Sector , 2013, Artificial Life.

[16]  Mark A. Bedau,et al.  The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science: THE ORIGIN AND EXTENT OF NATURAL LIFE , 2010 .

[17]  James M. Whitacre,et al.  Pervasive Flexibility in Living Technologies through Degeneracy-Based Design , 2011, Artificial Life.

[18]  A. Adamatzky Slimeware: Engineering Devices with Slime Mold , 2013, Artificial Life.

[19]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  A roadmap to protocells , 2008 .