Multi-modality in gene regulatory networks with slow promoter kinetics

Phenotypical variability in the absence of genetic variation often reflects complex energetic landscapes associated with underlying gene regulatory networks (GRNs). In this view, different phenotypes are associated with alternative states of complex nonlinear systems: stable attractors in deterministic models or modes of stationary distributions in stochastic descriptions. We provide theoretical and practical characterizations of these landscapes, specifically focusing on stochastic Slow Promoter Kinetics (SPK), a time scale relevant when transcription factor binding and unbinding are affected by epigenetic processes like DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling. In this case, largely unexplored except for numerical simulations, adiabatic approximations of promoter kinetics are not appropriate. In contrast to the existing literature, we provide rigorous analytic characterizations of multiple modes. A general formal approach gives insight into the influence of parameters and the prediction of how changes in GRN wiring, for example through mutations or artificial interventions, impact the possible number, location, and likelihood of alternative states. We adapt tools from the mathematical field of singular perturbation theory to represent stationary distributions of Chemical Master Equations for GRNs as mixtures of Poisson distributions and obtain explicit formulas for the locations and probabilities of metastable states as a function of the parameters describing the system. As illustrations, the theory is used to tease out the role of cooperative binding in stochastic models in comparison to deterministic models, and applications are given to various model systems, such as toggle switches in isolation or in communicating populations, a synthetic oscillator, and a trans-differentiation network.

[1]  Ilya Potapov,et al.  Multi-stable dynamics of the non-adiabatic repressilator , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Cong Chen,et al.  A physical mechanism of cancer heterogeneity , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Guy Karlebach,et al.  Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  Paul C. Bressloff,et al.  Stochastic switching in biology: from genotype to phenotype , 2017 .

[5]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Varying virulence: epigenetic control of expression noise and disease processes. , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[6]  Hong Qian,et al.  Stochastic bifurcation, slow fluctuations, and bistability as an origin of biochemical complexity. , 2009, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[7]  Michail Stamatakis,et al.  Comparison of deterministic and stochastic models of the lac operon genetic network. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Stochastic Switching of Cell Fate in Microbes. , 2015, Annual review of microbiology.

[9]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Quorum-Sensing Synchronization of Synthetic Toggle Switches: A Design Based on Monotone Dynamical Systems Theory , 2015, bioRxiv.

[10]  Kevin Hauser,et al.  Multiscale effects of heating and cooling on genes and gene networks , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  H. Qian,et al.  A Quasistationary Analysis of a Stochastic Chemical Reaction: Keizer’s Paradox , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[12]  F. Bruggeman,et al.  Introduction to systems biology. , 2007, EXS.

[13]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[14]  James E Ferrell,et al.  Q&A: Cooperativity , 2009, Journal of biology.

[15]  Guilherme C P Innocentini,et al.  Comment on "Steady-state fluctuations of a genetic feedback loop: an exact solution" [J. Chem. Phys. 137, 035104 (2012)]. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  Gabriel S. Eichler,et al.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[17]  Jin Wang,et al.  A new mechanism of stem cell differentiation through slow binding/unbinding of regulators to genes , 2012, Scientific reports.

[18]  Arjun Raj,et al.  What's Luck Got to Do with It: Single Cells, Multiple Fates, and Biological Nondeterminism. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[19]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[20]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Self-regulating gene: an exact solution. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  S. Orkin,et al.  PU.1 inhibits GATA-1 function and erythroid differentiation by blocking GATA-1 DNA binding. , 2000, Blood.

[22]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation , 2012, Science.

[23]  M. Tabaka,et al.  Bimodal gene expression in noncooperative regulatory systems , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  J. D. Engel,et al.  Regulation and function of transcription factor GATA-1 during red blood cell differentiation. , 1996, Development.

[25]  C. Rao,et al.  Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: Application to the Gillespie algorithm , 2003 .

[26]  T. Enver,et al.  Forcing cells to change lineages , 2009, Nature.

[27]  P. Kokotovic,et al.  A singular perturbation approach to modeling and control of Markov chains , 1981 .

[28]  Sui Huang,et al.  Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  Michael Dean,et al.  Tumour stem cells and drug resistance , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  Y. Lai,et al.  Engineering of a synthetic quadrastable gene network to approach Waddington landscape and cell fate determination , 2017, eLife.

[31]  Jason R. Pirone,et al.  Fluctuations in transcription factor binding can explain the graded and binary responses observed in inducible gene expression. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[33]  A. Páldi Stochastic gene expression during cell differentiation: order from disorder? , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[34]  R. Grima,et al.  Linear mapping approximation of gene regulatory networks with stochastic dynamics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[35]  Gábor Balázsi,et al.  Network of mutually repressive metastasis regulators can promote cell heterogeneity and metastatic transitions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Masayuki Yamamoto,et al.  Self-Association of Gata1 Enhances Transcriptional Activity In Vivo in Zebra Fish Embryos , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[37]  Hong Qian,et al.  Stochastic phenotype transition of a single cell in an intermediate region of gene state switching. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[38]  Brian K. Chu,et al.  Markov State Models of gene regulatory networks , 2016, BMC Systems Biology.

[39]  N. Popović,et al.  Phenotypic switching in gene regulatory networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  J. Collins,et al.  Programmable cells: interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Vincenzo Calvanese,et al.  Epigenetics of embryonic stem cells. , 2012, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[42]  Thomas G. Kurtz,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of Biochemical Systems , 2015 .

[43]  Shangying Wang,et al.  Quantifying Gene Regulatory Networks , 2014 .

[44]  Kirsten L. Frieda,et al.  A Stochastic Single-Molecule Event Triggers Phenotype Switching of a Bacterial Cell , 2008, Science.

[45]  C. Waddington The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[46]  L. Doré,et al.  Transcription factor networks in erythroid cell and megakaryocyte development. , 2011, Blood.

[47]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Modeling a synthetic multicellular clock: repressilators coupled by quorum sensing. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  F. Hayot,et al.  Stochasticity of gene products from transcriptional pulsing. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[49]  U. Alon An introduction to systems biology : design principles of biological circuits , 2019 .

[50]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[51]  R. Z. Khasminskii,et al.  Constructing asymptotic series for probability distributions of Markov chains with weak and strong interactions , 1997 .

[52]  S. Meyn,et al.  Stability of Markovian processes III: Foster–Lyapunov criteria for continuous-time processes , 1993, Advances in Applied Probability.

[53]  Marcin Tabaka,et al.  Quantitative influence of macromolecular crowding on gene regulation kinetics , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[54]  Ofer Biham,et al.  Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[55]  D. Vecchio,et al.  Biomolecular Feedback Systems , 2014 .

[56]  Péter Érdi,et al.  Mathematical Models of Chemical Reactions: Theory and Applications of Deterministic and Stochastic Models , 1989 .

[57]  Vahid Shahrezaei,et al.  Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Tsz-Leung To,et al.  Noise Can Induce Bimodality in Positive Transcriptional Feedback Loops Without Bistability , 2010, Science.

[59]  Davit A Potoyan,et al.  Dichotomous noise models of gene switches. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[60]  S. Campbell,et al.  Singular Perturbation of Autonomous Linear Systems , 1979 .

[61]  S. Orkin,et al.  Self-association of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 mediated by its zinc finger domains , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[62]  A. Duncan,et al.  Noise-induced multistability in chemical systems: Discrete versus continuum modeling. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[63]  Ty C. Voss,et al.  Dynamic regulation of transcriptional states by chromatin and transcription factors , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[64]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[65]  Deena R. Schmidt,et al.  Steady-state fluctuations of a genetic feedback loop: an exact solution. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[66]  M. Feinberg Chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors—I. The deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems , 1987 .

[67]  I. Bose,et al.  Graded and binary responses in stochastic gene expression , 2004, Physical biology.

[68]  Niraj Kumar,et al.  Exact distributions for stochastic gene expression models with bursting and feedback. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[69]  Shilpa Sharma,et al.  Epigenetic Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells , 2016, International journal of stem cells.

[70]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[71]  S. Baylin,et al.  Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[72]  Pu Zhang,et al.  Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[73]  Guy S. Salvesen,et al.  SnapShot: Caspases , 2011, Cell.

[74]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[75]  Sui Huang,et al.  On the intrinsic inevitability of cancer: from foetal to fatal attraction. , 2011, Seminars in cancer biology.

[76]  Wei Han,et al.  Cell fate potentials and switching kinetics uncovered in a classic bistable genetic switch , 2018, Nature Communications.

[77]  Jae Kyoung Kim,et al.  Reduction of multiscale stochastic biochemical reaction networks using exact moment derivation , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[78]  Hahl Sayuri,et al.  A Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Modeling Approaches for Biochemical Reaction Systems: On Fixed Points, Means, and Modes , 2016 .

[79]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Short-term memory in gene induction reveals the regulatory principle behind stochastic IL-4 expression , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[80]  Andreas Kremling,et al.  A Comparison of Deterministic and Stochastic Modeling Approaches for Biochemical Reaction Systems: On Fixed Points, Means, and Modes , 2016, Front. Genet..

[81]  Zhonghuai Hou,et al.  Small-number effects: a third stable state in a genetic bistable toggle switch. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[82]  Klaus Aktories,et al.  Noise Can Induce Bimodality in Positive Transcriptional Feedback Loops Without Bistability , 2010 .

[83]  Pavel Burda,et al.  GATA-1 Inhibits PU.1 Gene via DNA and Histone H3K9 Methylation of Its Distal Enhancer in Erythroleukemia , 2016, PloS one.

[84]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[85]  Lei Yuan,et al.  A role of stochastic phenotype switching in generating mosaic endothelial cell heterogeneity , 2016, Nature Communications.

[86]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Stochastic multistationarity in a model of the hematopoietic stem cell differentiation network , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[87]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[88]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[89]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Reduction and solution of the chemical master equation using time scale separation and finite state projection. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[90]  W. Ebeling,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of a bistable reaction system , 1979 .

[91]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Stochasticity is necessary for multiple attractors in a class of differentiation networks , 2018 .

[92]  Ankit Gupta,et al.  A Scalable Computational Framework for Establishing Long-Term Behavior of Stochastic Reaction Networks , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[93]  E. Altman,et al.  Perturbation analysis for denumerable Markov chains with application to queueing models , 2004, Advances in Applied Probability.

[94]  Tianshou Zhou,et al.  Roles of factorial noise in inducing bimodal gene expression. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.