Multiobjective optimization of steam reformer performance using genetic algorithm

An existing side-fired steam reformer is simulated using a rigorous model with proven reaction kinetics, incorporating aspects of heat transfer in the furnace and diffusion in the catalyst pellet. Thereafter, “optimal” conditions, which could lead to an improvement in its performance, are obtained. An adaptation of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm is employed to perform a multiobjective optimization. For a fixed production rate of hydrogen from the unit, the simultaneous minimization of the methane feed rate and the maximization of the flow rate of carbon monoxide in the syngas are chosen as the two objective functions, keeping in mind the processing requirements, heat integration, and economics. For the design configuration considered in this study, sets of Pareto-optimal operating conditions are obtained. The results are expected to enable the engineer to gain useful insights into the process and guide him/her in operating the reformer to minimize processing costs and to maximize profits.

[1]  G. Froment,et al.  Coupled simulation of heat transfer and reaction in a steam reforming furnace , 1989 .

[2]  张述伟,et al.  SIMULATION ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF STEAM REFORMING PROCESS FOR A LARGE-SCALE AMMONIA PLANT , 1994 .

[3]  J. C. De Deken,et al.  Steam Reforming of Natural Gas: Intrinsic Kinetics, Diffusional Influences, and Reactor Design , 1982 .

[4]  Said S.E.H. Elnashaie,et al.  Modelling, Simulation and Optimization of Industrial Fixed Bed Catalytic Reactors , 1994 .

[5]  F. W. Hohmann Improve steam reformer performance : Petrochemical developments , 1996 .

[6]  Gilbert Froment,et al.  Steam reforming analyzed , 1992 .

[7]  Moustafa A. Soliman,et al.  Simulation of Steam Reformers for Methane , 1988 .

[8]  Singh C.P.P.,et al.  Simulation of Side Fired Steam-Hydrocarbon Reformers , 1979 .

[9]  A. M. Adris,et al.  On the reported attempts to radically improve the performance of the steam methane reforming reactor , 1996 .

[10]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[11]  Moustafa A. Soliman,et al.  Digital simulation of industrial steam reformers for natural gas using heterogeneous models , 1992 .

[12]  Jens R. Rostrup-Nielsen,et al.  Catalytic Steam Reforming , 1984 .

[13]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Evolutionary Computation.

[14]  M. Hyman SIMULATE METHANE REFORMER REACTIONS , 1968 .

[15]  David L. Trimm,et al.  Coke formation and minimisation during steam reforming reactions , 1997 .

[16]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[17]  B. Finlayson,et al.  Orthogonal collocation on finite elements , 1975 .

[18]  Moustafa A. Soliman,et al.  On the non-monotonic behaviour of methane—steam reforming kinetics , 1990 .

[19]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming: II. Diffusional limitations and reactor simulation , 1989 .

[20]  Ernest J. Henley,et al.  Separation Process Principles , 1998 .

[21]  Kishalay Mitra,et al.  Multiobjective dynamic optimization of an industrial Nylon 6 semibatch reactor using genetic algorit , 1998 .