Depoliticisation, demoralisation and depersonalisation – and how to better them

In this article the author reflects on three key processes – depoliticisation, demoralisation and depersonalisation – which have been evident during recent decades in his experience of education. He argues that he does this from the standpoint of someone who had a working commitment to pastoral care and personal‐social education, but for whom such commitments now make up a very small part of his professional life. The context referred to is the UK, and England in the main, although the processes discussed are also evident in other countries. His purpose is not merely to catalogue these processes, but to consider how they have had their effects and how such effects may be worked against in current times for the good of pupils’ and teachers’ personal‐social development.

[1]  G. Vulliamy,et al.  Changing classroom practice at Key Stage 2: the impact of New Labour’s national strategies , 2007 .

[2]  Chris Watkins,et al.  Effective learning in classrooms , 2007 .

[3]  C. Watkins Personalised Classroom Learning , 2006 .

[4]  B. Crick Approaching the political in citizenship education , 2006 .

[5]  B. Crick,et al.  Approaching the political in citizenship education : The perspectives of Paulo Freire and Bernard Crick , 2006 .

[6]  C. Watkins When Teachers Reclaim Learning. , 2006 .

[7]  C. Watkins Classrooms as Learning Communities: What's In It For Schools? , 2005 .

[8]  S. Nichols,et al.  The Inevitable Corruption of Indicators and Educators through High-Stakes Testing. Executive Summary. , 2005 .

[9]  S. Dainton Reclaiming Teachers' Voices. , 2005 .

[10]  J. Doughty,et al.  Research on Divorce, Separation and Family Change: Messages for Practitioners , 2004 .

[11]  P. Tymms Are standards rising in English primary schools , 2004 .

[12]  C. Watkins Reclaiming Pastoral Care , 2004 .

[13]  Charles Leadbeater,et al.  Personalisation Through Participation: A New Script for Public Services , 2004 .

[14]  Janet Moyles,et al.  How do primary school teachers define and implement ‘interactive teaching’ in the National Literacy Strategy in England? , 2003 .

[15]  Elizabeth Mcness,et al.  Is the Effective Compromising the Affective , 2003 .

[16]  R. Merry,et al.  How Do Elementary School Teachers Define and Implement "Interactive Teaching" in the National Literacy Hour (NLH) in England?. , 2002 .

[17]  C. Watkins Learning about learning enhances performance , 2001 .

[18]  M. Grimsley,et al.  Minding the Gap: Ethnic, gender and social class differences in attainment at 16, 1988‐95 , 2000 .

[19]  E. Jenkins The impact of the national curriculum on secondary school science teaching in England and Wales , 2000 .

[20]  D. Wiliam,et al.  ’I’ ll be a nothing’: structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment , 1999 .

[21]  Susan Ohanian,et al.  One Size Fits Few: The Folly of Educational Standards. , 1999 .

[22]  P. Gardner Classroom Teachers and Educational Change 1876-1996 , 1998 .

[23]  Allan Wade,et al.  Small Acts of Living: Everyday Resistance to Violence and Other Forms of Oppression , 1997 .

[24]  S. Hammond The Thin Book of Appreciative Inquiry , 1996 .

[25]  K. Delucchi,et al.  Effects of Two Contrasting School Task and Incentive Structures on Children's Social Development , 1991, The Elementary School Journal.

[26]  S. J. Rosenholtz Teacher's workplace : the social organization of schools , 1991 .

[27]  M. Mclaughlin Test-Based Accountability as a Reform Strategy. , 1991 .

[28]  C. Watkins Does Pastoral Care = Personal and Social Education? , 1985 .

[29]  周 義澄,et al.  Education and science , 1983 .

[30]  D. Heater,et al.  Political education in flux , 1981 .

[31]  James Miller Legitimation Crisis , 1975, Telos.

[32]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates” , 1939 .