Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study

In the study of neural circuits, it becomes essential to discern the different neuronal cell types that build the circuit. Traditionally, neuronal cell types have been classified using qualitative descriptors. More recently, several attempts have been made to classify neurons quantitatively, using unsupervised clustering methods. While useful, these algorithms do not take advantage of previous information known to the investigator, which could improve the classification task. For neocortical GABAergic interneurons, the problem to discern among different cell types is particularly difficult and better methods are needed to perform objective classifications. Here we explore the use of supervised classification algorithms to classify neurons based on their morphological features, using a database of 128 pyramidal cells and 199 interneurons from mouse neocortex. To evaluate the performance of different algorithms we used, as a “benchmark,” the test to automatically distinguish between pyramidal cells and interneurons, defining “ground truth” by the presence or absence of an apical dendrite. We compared hierarchical clustering with a battery of different supervised classification algorithms, finding that supervised classifications outperformed hierarchical clustering. In addition, the selection of subsets of distinguishing features enhanced the classification accuracy for both sets of algorithms. The analysis of selected variables indicates that dendritic features were most useful to distinguish pyramidal cells from interneurons when compared with somatic and axonal morphological variables. We conclude that supervised classification algorithms are better matched to the general problem of distinguishing neuronal cell types when some information on these cell groups, in our case being pyramidal or interneuron, is known a priori. As a spin‐off of this methodological study, we provide several methods to automatically distinguish neocortical pyramidal cells from interneurons, based on their morphologies. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 71: 71–82, 2011

[1]  S. R. Cajal.  Textura del Sistema Nervioso del Hombre y de los Vertebrados, 1899–1904 , 2019 .

[2]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[3]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Steps toward Artificial Intelligence , 1995, Proceedings of the IRE.

[4]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[5]  Robin Sibson,et al.  The Construction of Hierarchic and Non-Hierarchic Classifications , 1968, Comput. J..

[6]  W. J. Conover,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 1972 .

[7]  M. Stone.  Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[8]  M. Dennis,et al.  Developmental neurobiology , 1971, Neurology.

[9]  J. Kittler,et al.  Feature Set Search Alborithms , 1978 .

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[11]  D. Rumelhart.  Learning internal representations by back-propagating errors , 1986 .

[12]  A. Peters.  Number of Neurons and Synapses in Primary Visual Cortex , 1987 .

[13]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[14]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[15]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[16]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[17]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Feature Selection for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 1998 .

[19]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[20]  David J. Groggel,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics , 2000, Technometrics.

[21]  J. Rossier,et al.  Classification of fusiform neocortical interneurons based on unsupervised clustering. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Ian Witten,et al.  Data Mining , 2000 .

[23]  R. Yuste,et al.  Stereotyped position of local synaptic targets in neocortex. , 2001, Science.

[24]  L. Luo,et al.  Representation of the Glomerular Olfactory Map in the Drosophila Brain , 2002, Cell.

[25]  Richard Axel,et al.  Spatial Representation of the Glomerular Map in the Drosophila Protocerebrum , 2002, Cell.

[26]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[27]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Quantitative morphologic classification of layer 5 neurons from mouse primary visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Dendritic size of pyramidal neurons differs among mouse cortical regions. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  R. Yuste,et al.  Correlation between axonal morphologies and synaptic input kinetics of interneurons from mouse visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  E. P. Gardner,et al.  Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Neuronal correlates of local, lateral, and translaminar inhibition with reference to cortical columns. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Demian Battaglia,et al.  Classification of NPY-Expressing Neocortical Interneurons , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Moritz Helmstaedter,et al.  L2/3 interneuron groups defined by multiparameter analysis of axonal projection, dendritic geometry, and electrical excitability. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Moritz Helmstaedter,et al.  The relation between dendritic geometry, electrical excitability, and axonal projections of L2/3 interneurons in rat barrel cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[36]  R. Yuste,et al.  Neural Circuits Original Research Article Materials and Methods Preparation of Brain Slices , 2022 .