Providing Varying Degrees of Guidance for Work-Integrated Learning

We present a work-integrated learning (WIL) concept which aims at empowering employees to learn while performing their work tasks. Within three usage scenarios we introduce the APOSDLE environment which embodies the WIL concept and helps knowledge workers move fluidly along the whole spectrum of WIL activities. By doing so, they are experiencing varying degrees of learning guidance: from building awareness, over exposing knowledge structures and contextualizing cooperation, to triggering reflection and systematic competence development. Four key APOSDLE components are responsible for providing this variety of learning guidance. The challenge in their design lies in offering learning guidance without being domain-specific and without relying on manually created learning content. Our three month summative workplace evaluation within three application organizations suggests that learners prefer awarenss building functionalities and descriptive learning guidance and reveals that they benefited from it.

[1]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  Designing with Only Four People in Mind? - A Case Study of Using Personas to Redesign a Work-Integrated Learning Support System , 2009, INTERACT.

[2]  Robert E. Haskell Reengineering Corporate Training: Intellectual Capital and Transfer of Learning , 1998 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[4]  Sara Jones,et al.  Use and Influence of Creative Ideas and Requirements for a Work-Integrated Learning System , 2008, 2008 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference.

[5]  Judy Kay,et al.  Learner Control , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[6]  Sara Jones,et al.  A Multi-Activity Distributed Participatory Design Process for St imulating Creativity in the Specification of Requirements for a Work-Integrated Learning System , 2008 .

[7]  Robert Haskell Reengineering Corporate Training , 2009 .

[8]  D. Schugurensky,et al.  The forms of informal learning: towards a conceptualization of the field , 2000 .

[9]  Tobias Ley,et al.  How Do People Learn at the Workplace? Investigating Four Workplace Learning Assumptions , 2007, EC-TEL.

[10]  M. Eraut,et al.  The Significance of Workplace Learning for Individuals, Groups and Organisations , 2007 .

[11]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  An online forum as a user diary for remote workplace evaluation of a work-integrated learning system , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Stefanie N. Lindstaedt,et al.  Getting to Know Your User - Unobtrusive User Model Maintenance within Work-Integrated Learning Environments , 2009, EC-TEL.

[13]  Stefanie N. Lindstaedt,et al.  A Network Model Approach to Retrieval in the Semantic Web , 2008, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[14]  Knowledge work as organizational behavior , 2000 .

[15]  Tobias Ley,et al.  A Competence-based Approach for Formalizing Learning Goals in Work-integrated Learning , 2008 .

[16]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Programmable design environments: integrating end-user programming with domain-oriented assistance , 1994, CHI '94.