Sensory and cognitive determinants of reading speed

Fast readers and average readers were tested on four tasks. Neither peripheral letter identification nor susceptibility of foveal letter identification to patterned masking differed between the two groups. However, fast readers appear to pick up more information per fixation on structured textual material, as indexed by a forced-choice test. Furthermore, the average fast reader had a greater span of apprehension for unrelated elements. It appears that faster readers are able to encode more of the contents of each fixation, whether or not higher order linguistic structure is present. The results are inconsistent with the view that reading speed is dependent solely on the reader's ability to infer or fill in missing information.

[1]  H. Schiffman.  Some Components of Sensation and Perception for the Reading Process , 1972 .

[2]  Steven J. Wilson,et al.  Experimental manipulation of reading strategies. , 1973 .

[3]  N. Mackworth.  Seven Cognitive Skills in Reading , 1972 .

[4]  B. L. Zuber,et al.  Some Temporal Characteristics of Information Processing During Reading. , 1972 .

[5]  K. Goodman.  Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game , 1967 .

[6]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  L. C. Gilbert.  Speed of processing visual stimuli and its relation to reading. , 1959 .

[8]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  E A TAYLOR,et al.  The spans: perception, apprehension, and recognition as related to reading and speed reading. , 1957, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  E. B. Huey.  The Psychology And Pedagogy Of Reading , 1908 .

[11]  Stanford E. Taylor.  Eye Movements in Reading: Facts and Fallacies , 1965 .

[12]  John Morton,et al.  The Effects of Context upon Speed of Reading, Eye Movements and Eye-voice Span , 1964 .

[13]  N Weisstein,et al.  A Rashevsky-Landahl neural net: simulation of metacontrast. , 1968, Psychological review.

[14]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Reading and visual search , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[15]  H. Bouma.  Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. , 1973, Vision research.

[16]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .