Response time re-scaling and Weber's law in adapting biological systems

Systems biology has revealed numerous examples of networks whose dynamic behavior is robust to system perturbations and noise. In many cases, this behavior arises from simple yet fundamental features of the system architecture. A well-studied example is the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli. In various models of this system, it is shown that simple assumptions on the receptor methylation dynamics lead to robust perfect adaptation of chemotactic activity. Recent experimental work has also shown that the transient E. coli chemotactic response is unchanged by a scaling of its ligand input signal; this behavior is called fold change detection (FCD), and is in agreement with earlier mathematical predictions. However, this prediction was based on very particular assumptions on the structure of the chemotaxis pathway. In this work, we begin by showing that behavior similar to FCD can be obtained under weaker conditions on the system structure. Namely, we show that under relaxed conditions, a scaling of the chemotaxis system's inputs leads to a time scaling of the output response. We propose that this may be a contributing factor to the robustness of the experimentally observed FCD. We further show that FCD is a special case of this time scaling behavior for which the time scaling factor of unity. We then proceed to extend the conditions for output time scaling to more general adapting systems, and demonstrate this time scaling behavior on a published model of the chemotaxis pathway of the bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. This work therefore provides examples of how robust biological behavior can arise from simple yet realistic conditions on the underlying system structure.

[1]  Judith P. Armitage,et al.  Signal processing in complex chemotaxis pathways , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[2]  Monica L. Skoge,et al.  Chemosensing in Escherichia coli: two regimes of two-state receptors. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Fold-change detection and scalar symmetry of sensory input fields , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Yuhai Tu,et al.  Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  J. Adler,et al.  The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range , 1973, The Journal of general physiology.

[8]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Design and Diversity in Bacterial Chemotaxis: A Comparative Study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis , 2004, PLoS biology.

[10]  Patrick E. McSharry,et al.  Feedback Control Architecture and the Bacterial Chemotaxis Network , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[12]  D. Bray,et al.  A free-energy-based stochastic simulation of the Tar receptor complex. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  H. Berg,et al.  A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Symmetry invariance for adapting biological systems , 2010, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..