Price Volatility in Electricity Markets: A Stochastic Control Perspective

Spot prices in deregulated electricity markets in the United States and Europe have historically displayed high volatility, leading to loss of revenue in high electricity costs, weakening economic growth and lost business from long blackouts. With rapidly increasing supply of intermittent solar and wind-based power, conditions in the foreseeable future are only expected to deteriorate. Geographic price variations, while capable of being quite dramatic themselves, are a natural outcome of Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) that takes finite transmission capacity and congestion into consideration, to produce localized electricity prices. Temporal price volatility (considerable fluctuation over periods as short as an hour in particular), however, is harder to explain. In an effort to unearth the cause of these price fluctuations, we propose to model the electricity market as a discrete time controlled stochastic process. While this is a stylized model, it facilitates the analysis of spot markets and helps exclude extraneous details that do not contribute significantly to the discussion. We show that in any such market, improving social welfare must necessarily be traded off with volatility in prices, i.e., it is impossible to reduce volatility in the price of electricity without sacrificing social welfare. We also show that, akin to communication systems, every market has a Capacity Region associated with it, that dictates and quantifies how much welfare is achievable at a given level of price volatility. In the context of renewable power sources, our investigation uncovers an intriguing phenomenon we term the volatility cliff, which suggests that with increasing penetration of intermittent renewable production, price volatility could increase to unacceptable levels, prompting the need for a complete restructuring of existing electricity markets.

[1]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Competitive equilibrium in electricity markets with heterogeneous users and price fluctuation penalty , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  David K. Smith,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control. Volume 1 , 1996 .

[3]  Chi-Keung Woo,et al.  The impact of wind generation on the electricity spot-market price level and variance: The Texas experience , 2011 .

[4]  Onésimo Hernández Lerma,et al.  The Lagrange approach to constrained Markov control processes: a survey and extension of results , 2003 .

[5]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  Opportunities and barriers to pumped-hydro energy storage in the United States , 2011 .

[6]  Munther A. Dahleh,et al.  Volatility of Power Grids Under Real-Time Pricing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[8]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Regulation and double price mechanisms in markets with friction , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[9]  Steve Pye,et al.  Improving deep decarbonization modelling capacity for developed and developing country contexts , 2016 .

[10]  Lorenzo Kristov,et al.  A Tale of Two Visions: Designing a Decentralized Transactive Electric System , 2016, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[11]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[12]  Rahul Singh,et al.  Decentralized Control via Dynamic Stochastic Prices: The Independent System Operator Problem , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  Loren Fox,et al.  Enron: The Rise and Fall , 2002 .

[14]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks , 1992 .

[15]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Reducing electricity price volatility via stochastic storage control , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[16]  A. Venturini,et al.  Day-ahead market price volatility analysis in deregulated electricity markets , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting,.

[17]  William W. Hogan Demand response compensation, net Benefits and cost allocation: comments , 2010 .

[18]  P. Joskow,et al.  Challenges for wholesale electricity markets with intermittent renewable generation at scale: the US experience , 2019, Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

[19]  F. Schweppe,et al.  Real Time Pricing to Assist in Load Frequency Control , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[20]  A. Banerjee Convex Analysis and Optimization , 2006 .

[21]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Regulation and efficiency in markets with friction , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[22]  Sean P. Meyn,et al.  Efficiency and marginal cost pricing in dynamic competitive markets with friction , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[23]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Overgeneration from Solar Energy in California - A Field Guide to the Duck Chart , 2015 .

[24]  Kenji Hirata,et al.  A dynamic mechanism for LQG power networks with random type parameters and pricing delay , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[25]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control 3rd Edition, Volume II , 2010 .

[26]  E. Altman Constrained Markov Decision Processes , 1999 .

[27]  Rekha Reddy,et al.  Lowering Electricity Prices Through Deregulation , 2000 .