Benchmarking cerebellar control

Abstract Cerebellar models have long been advocated as viable models for robot dynamics control. Building on an increasing insight in and knowledge of the biological cerebellum, many models have been greatly refined, of which some computational models have emerged with useful properties with respect to robot dynamics control. Looking at the application side, however, there is a totally different picture. Not only is there a robot on the market which uses anything remotely connected with cerebellar control, but also in research labs most testbeds for cerebellar models are restricted to toy problems. Such applications hardly ever exceed the complexity of a 2 DoF simulated robot arm; a task which is hardly representative for the field of robotics, or relates to realistic applications. In order to bring the amalgamation of the two fields forward, we advocate the use of a set of robotics benchmarks, on which existing and new computational cerebellar models can be comparatively tested. It is clear that the traditional approach to solve robotics dynamics loses ground with the advancing complexity of robotic structures; there is a desire for adaptive methods which can compete as traditional control methods do for traditional robots. In this paper we try to lay down the successes and problems in the fields of cerebellar modelling as well as robot dynamics control. By analysing the common ground, a set of benchmarks are suggested which may serve as typical robot applications for cerebellar models.

[1]  M. Glickstein,et al.  Cerebellar agenesis. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Patrick van der Smagt Cerebellar Control of Robot Arms , 1998, Connect. Sci..

[3]  W. Thomas Miller,et al.  Real-time application of neural networks for sensor-based control of robots with vision , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[5]  D. Linden Cerebellar long-term depression as investigated in a cell culture preparation , 1996 .

[6]  W. Singer,et al.  Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission and its relationship to long-term potentiation , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Neural Network Control of a Pneumatic Robot Arm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[8]  E. De Schutter A new functional role for cerebellar long-term depression. , 1997, Progress in brain research.

[9]  John J. Craig,et al.  Introduction to Robotics Mechanics and Control , 1986 .

[10]  I. Zagon,et al.  Neural populations in the human cerebellum: estimations from isolated cell nuclei , 1977, Brain Research.

[11]  David Willshaw,et al.  The cerebellum as a neuronal machine , 1999 .

[12]  A. Gandjour The Comparative Anatomy and Histology of the Cerebellum , 1967 .

[13]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Is the cerebellum a smith predictor? , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of a rapid grasp. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Michael G. Paulin,et al.  A Kalman filter theory of the cerebellum , 1988 .

[16]  G. Holmes THE SYMPTOMS OF ACUTE CEREBELLAR INJURIES DUE TO GUNSHOT INJURIES , 1917 .

[17]  O. J. M. Smith,et al.  A controller to overcome dead time , 1959 .

[18]  A. Barto,et al.  Models of the cerebellum and motor learning , 1996 .

[19]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[20]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Learning arm kinematics and dynamics. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  Masao Ito The Cerebellum And Neural Control , 1984 .

[22]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Cerebellum and motor control , 1998 .

[23]  N. Hogan Mechanical Impedance of Single- and Multi-Articular Systems , 1990 .

[24]  Suguru Arimoto,et al.  Stability and robustness of PID feedback control for robot manipulators of sensory capability , 1984 .

[25]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Temporal credit assignment in reinforcement learning , 1984 .

[26]  Heidar Ali Talebi,et al.  Neural network based control schemes for flexible-link manipulators: simulations and experiments , 1998, Neural Networks.

[27]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. I. Changes in the responses of brain stem neurons. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Douglas R. Wylie,et al.  More on climbing fiber signals and their consequence(s) , 1996 .

[29]  M. Kawato,et al.  Multiple internal models in the cerebellum: A functional MRI study , 1998, Neuroscience Research.

[30]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Analysis and control of a rubbertuator arm , 1996, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  Sensorimotor Skill Transfer of Compliant Motion , 2000 .

[32]  James S. Albus,et al.  New Approach to Manipulator Control: The Cerebellar Model Articulation Controller (CMAC)1 , 1975 .

[33]  M. Kano,et al.  Long-lasting potentiation of GABAergic inhibitory synaptic transmission in cerebellar purkinje cells : Its properties and possible mechanisms , 1996 .

[34]  J. Eccles,et al.  Synaptic actions on motoneurones caused by impulses in Golgi tendon organ afferents , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  J. Albus A Theory of Cerebellar Function , 1971 .

[36]  D. Bullock,et al.  How Spinal Neural Networks Reduce Discrepancies between Motor Intention and Motor Realization , 1991 .

[37]  J. Houk Cooperative Control of Limb Movements by the Motor Cortex, Brainstem and , 1989 .

[38]  Masao Ito,et al.  Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  J. Eccles,et al.  The convergence of monosynaptic excitatory afferents on to many different species of alpha motoneurones , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Masazumi Katayama,et al.  Learning Trajectory and Force Control of an Artificial Muscle Arm , 1990, NIPS.

[41]  V. Braitenberg,et al.  Morphological observations on the cerebellar cortex , 1958, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[42]  M. Kawato,et al.  The cerebellum and VOR/OKR learning models , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[43]  J. Jansen,et al.  The Comparative Anatomy and Histology of the Cerebellum: The Human Cerebellum, Cerebellar Connections, and Cerebellar Cortex , 1972 .

[44]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Cerebellum and conditioning , 1998 .

[45]  D. Marr A theory of cerebellar cortex , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  S. Lisberger Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. III. Computational and behavioral analysis of the sites of learning. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  S. Lisberger,et al.  Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. II. Changes in the responses of horizontal gaze velocity Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Dean V. Buonomano,et al.  Neural Network Model of the Cerebellum: Temporal Discrimination and the Timing of Motor Responses , 1999, Neural Computation.

[49]  G. Holmes THE CEREBELLUM OF MAN , 1939 .

[50]  W. Thomas Miller,et al.  Dynamic Balance of a Biped Walking Robot , 1997 .

[51]  O. Larsell,et al.  The comparative anatomy and histology of the cerebellum , 1967 .

[52]  V. Braitenberg Functional Interpretation of Cerebellar Histology , 1961, Nature.

[53]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[54]  P. Flourens Recherches expérimentales sur les propriétés et les fonctions du système nerveux dans les animaux vertébrés , 1842 .

[55]  G. Hirzinger Towards a new robot generation for space, terrestrial and medical applications , 1996 .

[56]  W. T. Miller,et al.  CMAC: an associative neural network alternative to backpropagation , 1990, Proc. IEEE.