Paradoxical Effects of External Modulation of Inhibitory Interneurons

The neocortex, hippocampus, and several other brain regions contain populations of excitatory principal cells with recurrent connections and strong interactions with local inhibitory interneurons. To improve our understanding of the interactions among these cell types, we modeled the dynamic behavior of this type of network, including external inputs. A surprising finding was that increasing the direct external inhibitory input to the inhibitory interneurons, without directly affecting any other part of the network, can, in some circumstances, cause the interneurons to increase their firing rates. The main prerequisite for this paradoxical response to external input is that the recurrent connections among the excitatory cells are strong enough to make the excitatory network unstable when feedback inhibition is removed. Because this requirement is met in the neocortex and several regions of the hippocampus, these observations have important implications for understanding the responses of interneurons to a variety of pharmacological and electrical manipulations. The analysis can be extended to a scenario with periodically varying external input, where it predicts a systematic relationship between the phase shift and depth of modulation for each interneuron. This prediction was tested by recording from interneurons in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampusin vivo, and the results broadly confirmed the model. These findings have further implications for the function of inhibitory and neuromodulatory circuits, which can be tested experimentally.

[1]  C. H. Vanderwolf,et al.  Hippocampal electrical activity and voluntary movement in the rat. , 1969, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[3]  L. S. Leung,et al.  Nonlinear feedback model of neuronal populations in hippocampal CAl region. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Martin Braun Differential equations and their applications , 1976 .

[5]  Edward G. Jones,et al.  Connectivity of the Primate Sensory-Motor Cortex , 1986 .

[6]  R. Frostig,et al.  Optical imaging of neuronal activity. , 1988, Physiological reviews.

[7]  T. Freund,et al.  GABA-containing neurons in the septum control inhibitory interneurons in the hippocampus , 1988, Nature.

[8]  L. Acsády,et al.  Serotonergic control of the hippocampus via local inhibitory interneurons. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Traub,et al.  Neuronal Networks of the Hippocampus , 1991 .

[10]  M. Witter,et al.  The Rat Nervous System , 1995 .

[11]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Hippocampal CA1 interneurons: an in vivo intracellular labeling study , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  R. Traub,et al.  Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation , 1995, Nature.

[13]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Population dynamics and theta rhythm phase precession of hippocampal place cell firing: A spiking neuron model , 1998, Hippocampus.

[15]  B. McNaughton,et al.  Theta phase precession in hippocampal neuronal populations and the compression of temporal sequences , 1996, Hippocampus.