On the Dynamics of Distributed Energy Adoption: Equilibrium, Stability, and Limiting Capacity

The death spiral hypothesis in electric utility represents a positive feedback phenomenon in which a regulated utility is driven to financial instability by rising prices and declining demand. We establish conditions for the existence of death spiral and conditions of stable adoption of distributed energy resources. We show in particular that linear tariffs always induce death spiral when the fixed operating cost of the utility rises beyond a certain threshold. For two-part tariffs with connection and volumetric charges, the Ramsey pricing, which myopically optimizes social welfare subject to the revenue adequacy constraint, induces a stable equilibrium. The Ramsey pricing, however, inhibits renewable adoption with a high connection charge. In contrast, a two-part tariff with a small connection charge results in a stable adoption process with a higher level of renewable adoption and greater long-term total consumer surplus. Market data are used to illustrate various solar adoption scenarios.

[1]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[2]  F. Ramsey A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation , 1927 .

[3]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Solar Deployment System (SolarDS) Model: Documentation and Sample Results , 2009 .

[4]  W. Oi A Disneyland Dilemma: Two-Part Tariffs for a Mickey Mouse Monopoly , 1971 .

[5]  Lang Tong,et al.  Renewables and Storage in Distribution Systems: Centralized vs. Decentralized Integration , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Lang Tong,et al.  On the Efficiency of Connection Charges—Part I: A Stochastic Framework , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Towhidul Islam,et al.  Household level innovation diffusion model of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells from stated preference data , 2014 .

[8]  S. Borenstein The economics of fixed cost recovery by utilities , 2016 .

[9]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[10]  J. Tirole,et al.  Retail Electricity Competition , 2004 .

[11]  Fredrik Link,et al.  Diffusion Dynamics and the Pricing of Innovations , 1998 .

[12]  K. M. Chandy,et al.  Impact of residential PV adoption on Retail Electricity Rates , 2013 .

[13]  Kenneth W. Costello Major Challenges of Distributed Generation for State Utility Regulators , 2015 .

[14]  Stephen J. Brown,et al.  The Theory of Public Utility Pricing , 1986 .

[15]  Lang Tong,et al.  Killing death spiral softly with a small connection charge , 2017, 2017 55th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[16]  Lang Tong,et al.  Dynamic Pricing and Distributed Energy Management for Demand Response , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[17]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Chris Marnay,et al.  Distributed Energy Resources Market Diffusion Model , 2006 .

[19]  N. Darghouth,et al.  Net metering and market feedback loops: Exploring the impact of retail rate design on distributed PV deployment , 2015 .

[20]  Lang Tong,et al.  On the Efficiency of Connection Charges—Part II: Integration of Distributed Energy Resources , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  K. Costello,et al.  Electric Utilities’ ‘Death Spiral’: Hyperbole or Reality? , 2014 .