Pspace-hard Functions Checkable Debate Systems and Approximation Algorithms for Pspace

to use journal articles in a variety of ways, limited only as required to insure fair attribution to authors and the journal, and to prohibit use in a competing commercial product. See the journal's World Wide Web site for further details. The Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal in theoretical computer science. The journal is committed to providing a forum for signiicant results on theoretical aspects of all topics in computer science. Abstract We initiate an investigation of probabilistically checkable debate Abstract-1 systems (PCDS), a natural generalization of probabilistically check-able proof systems (PCPS). A PCDS for a language L consists of a probabilistic polynomial-time veriier V and a debate between player 1, who claims that the input x is in L, and player 0, who claims that the input x is not in L. We show that there is a PCDS for L in which V ips O(log n) random coins and reads O(1) bits of the debate if and only if L is in PSPACE. This characterization of PSPACE is used to show that certain PSPACE-hard functions are as hard to approximate closely as they are to compute exactly.Hard Functionss CFLS93b].

[1]  Anne Condon The complexity of the max word problem and the power of one-way interactive proof systems , 2005, computational complexity.

[2]  Joan Feigenbaum,et al.  Random debaters and the hardness of approximating stochastic functions , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE 9th Annual Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory.

[3]  Joan Feigenbaum,et al.  Probabilistically checkable debate systems and approximation algorithms for PSPACE-hard functions , 1993, STOC.

[4]  Carsten Lund,et al.  Proof verification and hardness of approximation problems , 1992, Proceedings., 33rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[5]  Madhu Sudan,et al.  Highly Resilient Correctors for Polynomials , 1992, Inf. Process. Lett..

[6]  László Lovász,et al.  Approximating clique is almost NP-complete , 1991, [1991] Proceedings 32nd Annual Symposium of Foundations of Computer Science.

[7]  Carsten Lund,et al.  Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems , 1990, Proceedings [1990] 31st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[8]  Avi Wigderson,et al.  Dispersers, deterministic amplification, and weak random sources , 1989, 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[9]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  How to recycle random bits , 1989, 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[10]  László Babai,et al.  Arthur-Merlin Games: A Randomized Proof System, and a Hierarchy of Complexity Classes , 1988, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[11]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and Inrracrobiliry: A Guide ro the Theory of NP-Completeness , 1979 .

[12]  Thomas J. Schaefer,et al.  On the Complexity of Some Two-Person Perfect-Information Games , 1978, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[13]  Dexter Kozen,et al.  Lower bounds for natural proof systems , 1977, 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1977).

[14]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems , 1973, STOC.

[15]  Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery , 1961, Nature.