Automatic Localization of Interest Points in Zebrafish Images with Tree-Based Methods

In many biological studies, scientists assess effects of experimental conditions by visual inspection of microscopy images. They are able to observe whether a protein is expressed or not, if cells are going through normal cell cycles, how organisms evolve in different experimental conditions, etc. But, with the large number of images acquired in high-throughput experiments, this manual inspection becomes lengthy, tedious and error-prone. In this paper, we propose to automatically detect specific interest points in microscopy images using machine learning methods with the aim of performing automatic morphometric measurements in the context of Zebrafish studies. We systematically evaluate variants of ensembles of classification and regression trees on four datasets corresponding to different imaging modalities and experimental conditions. Our results show that all variants are effective, with a slight advantage for multiple output methods, which are more robust to parameter choices.

[1]  Michael Tsang,et al.  Automated image‐based phenotypic analysis in zebrafish embryos , 2009, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[2]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  Extremely randomized trees , 2006, Machine Learning.

[3]  K F ADKINS ALIZARIN RED S AS AN INTRAVITAL FLUOROCHROME IN MINERALIZING TISSUES. , 1965, Stain technology.

[4]  C. Kimmel,et al.  The shaping of pharyngeal cartilages during early development of the zebrafish. , 1998, Developmental biology.

[5]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Learning Fast Emulators of Binary Decision Processes , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Regression and classification approaches to eye localization in face images , 2006, 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FGR06).

[7]  Raphaël Marée,et al.  Random subwindows for robust image classification , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[8]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Hough Forests for Object Detection, Tracking, and Action Recognition , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Benoit M. Macq,et al.  Regression applied to protein binding site prediction and comparison with classification , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  Keypoint recognition using randomized trees , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Luc De Raedt,et al.  Top-Down Induction of Clustering Trees , 1998, ICML.

[12]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Validating automatic semantic annotation of anatomy in DICOM CT images , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Phenotypic analysis of images of zebrafish treated with Alzheimer's γ-secretase inhibitors , 2010, BMC biotechnology.

[14]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  Paola Campadelli,et al.  Eye localization: a survey , 2007 .

[16]  Markus Reischl,et al.  Methods for Automated High-Throughput Toxicity Testing Using Zebrafish Embryos , 2010, KI.

[17]  Raphaël Marée,et al.  Fast Multi-class Image Annotation with Random Subwindows and Multiple Output Randomized Trees , 2009, VISAPP.

[18]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[19]  Raphaël Marée,et al.  Phenotype Classification of Zebrafish Embryos by Supervised Learning , 2012, PloS one.