Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory.

With repeated exposure, people become better at identifying presented items and better at rejecting items that have not been presented. This differentiation effect is captured in a model consisting of item detectors that learn estimates of conditional probabilities of item features. The model is used to account for a number of findings in the recognition memory literature, including (a) the basic differentiation effect (strength-mirror effect), (b) the fact that adding items to a list reduces recognition accuracy (list-length effect) but extra study of some items does not reduce recognition accuracy for other items (null list-strength effect), (c) nonlinear effects of strengthening items on false recognition of similar distractors, (d) a number of different kinds of mirror effects, (e) appropriate z-ROC curves, and (f) one type of deviation from optimality exhibited in recognition experiments.

[1]  E. Gibson.  A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning , 1940 .

[2]  J. Gibson,et al.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.

[3]  E. Gibson,et al.  The effect of prolonged exposure to visually presented patterns on learning to discriminate them. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[5]  E. Gibson.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[6]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[7]  R. Oswalt.  Relationship between level of visual pattern difficulty during rearing and subsequent discrimination in rats. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  R. Cole.  Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech , 1973 .

[9]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[10]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical methods for educational and psychological research , 1976 .

[11]  On the relations between random walk models for two-choice response times , 1977 .

[12]  P E Morris.  Frequency and imagery in word recognition: further evidence for an attribute model. , 1978, British journal of psychology.

[13]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[14]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[15]  David A. Balota,et al.  Test-Expectancy and Word-Frequency Effects in Recall and Recognition , 1980 .

[16]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[18]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Deriving Exact Predictions From the Cascade Model , 1982 .

[19]  George O. Goodman,et al.  The word-frequency paradox in recognition , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A Theory of Human Memory: Self-Organization and Performance of Sensory-Motor Codes, Maps, and Plans , 1982 .

[21]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  OPTIMAL PERCEPTUAL INFERENCE , 1983 .

[22]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[23]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Study-phase processing and the word frequency effect in recognition memory. , 1984 .

[24]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[25]  A. Azzalini.  A class of distributions which includes the normal ones , 1985 .

[26]  David Zipser,et al.  Feature Discovery by Competive Learning , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[30]  G. V. van Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[31]  G. C. Orden.  A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[32]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[33]  James L. McClelland.  Stochastic Interactive Activation and the Effect of Context on Perception , 1989 .

[34]  Halbert White,et al.  Learning in Artificial Neural Networks: A Statistical Perspective , 1989, Neural Computation.

[35]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[36]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human memory: An adaptive perspective. , 1989 .

[37]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[39]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[40]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. , 1990 .

[41]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength Effect: Ii. Theoretical Mechanisms , 1990 .

[42]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  James L. McClelland.  Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  Y. Hoshino.  A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[45]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Interference and the representation of events in memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Word repetitions in sentence recognition , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[47]  D. L. Hintzman,et al.  Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  L. Squire.  Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[49]  K. Gegenfurtner.  PRAXIS: Brent’s algorithm for function minimization , 1992 .

[50]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Testing global memory models using ROC curves. , 1992, Psychological review.

[51]  James L. McClelland.  Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, and interactive networks , 1993 .

[52]  B. Murdock,et al.  Analysis of the list-strength effect. , 1993 .

[53]  S. C. Masin.  Foundations of perceptual theory , 1993 .

[54]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[55]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Normal and amnesic learning, recognition and memory by a neural model of cortico-hippocampal interactions , 1993, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Perceptual variability as a fundamental axiom of perceptual science , 1993 .

[57]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Scott D. Gronlund,et al.  List-length effect: Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions. , 1994 .

[59]  M. Humphreys,et al.  An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations : analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall , 1994 .

[60]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade‐off , 1994, Hippocampus.

[61]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect , 1994 .

[62]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  D. L. Hintzman.  On explaining the mirror effect. , 1994 .

[64]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[66]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayes factors and model uncertainty , 1995 .

[67]  D L Hintzman,et al.  When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[68]  E. Hirshman,et al.  Decision processes in recognition memory: criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  M. Gluck,et al.  Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in associative learning: A computational approach , 1995, Psychobiology.

[70]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[71]  J. D. Balakrishnan,et al.  Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[72]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[73]  N. Chater,et al.  Rational models of cognition , 1998 .

[74]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. , 1999 .