Gap junction effects on precision and frequency of a model pacemaker network.

We investigated the precision of spike timing in a model of gap junction-coupled oscillatory neurons. The model incorporated the known physiology, morphology, and connectivity of the weakly electric fish's high-frequency and extremely precise pacemaker nucleus (Pn). Two neuron classes, pacemaker and relay cells, were each modeled with two compartments containing Hodgkin-Huxley sodium and potassium currents. Isolated pacemaker cells fired periodically, due to a constant current injection; relay cells were silent but slightly depolarized at rest. When coupled by gap junctions to other neurons, a model neuron, like its biological correlate, spiked at frequencies and amplitudes that were largely independent of current injections. The phase distribution in the network was labile to intracellular current injections and to gap junction conductance changes. The model predicts a biologically plausible gap junction conductance of 4-5 nS (200-250 MOmega). This results in a coupling coefficient of approximately 0.02, as observed in vitro. Network parameters were varied to test which could improve the temporal precision of oscillations. Increased gap junction conductances and larger numbers of cells (holding total junctional conductance per cell constant) both substantially reduced the coefficient of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean) of relay cell spike times by 74-85% and more, and did so with lower gap junction conductance when cells were contacted axonically compared with somatically. Pacemaker cell CV was only reduced when the probability of contact was increased, and then only moderately: a fivefold increase in the probability of contact reduced CV by 35%. We conclude that gap junctions facilitate synchronization, can reduce CV, are most effective between axons, and that pacemaker cells must have low intrinsic CV to account for the low CV of cells in the biological network.

[1]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  K. Abromeit Music Received , 2023, Notes.

[3]  T. Bullock The Reliability of Neurons , 1970, The Journal of general physiology.

[4]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The Jamming Avoidance Response of High Frequency Electric Fish , 1972 .

[5]  R. Keynes The ionic channels in excitable membranes. , 1975, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[6]  T. Lamb,et al.  The relation between intercellular coupling and electrical noise in turtle photoreceptors. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. T. Enright Temporal precision in circadian systems: a reliable neuronal clock from unreliable components? , 1980, Science.

[8]  W. Heiligenberg,et al.  Input to the medullary pacemaker nucleus in the weakly electric fish, Eigenmannia (sternopygidae, gymnotiformes) , 1981, Brain Research.

[9]  B. Hille Ionic channels of excitable membranes , 2001 .

[10]  Carl W. Helstrom,et al.  Probability and stochastic processes for engineers , 1984 .

[11]  D. Spray,et al.  Regulation of gap junctional conductance. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[12]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  D. Spray,et al.  Physiology and pharmacology of gap junctions. , 1985, Annual review of physiology.

[14]  C. Carr,et al.  A time-comparison circuit in the electric fish midbrain. I. Behavior and physiology , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Baylor,et al.  Cyclic GMP-activated conductance of retinal photoreceptor cells. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Phase diagram for the collective behavior of limit-cycle oscillators. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[17]  E. Marder,et al.  The effect of electrical coupling on the frequency of model neuronal oscillators. , 1990, Science.

[18]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Model for synchronization of pancreatic beta-cells by gap junction coupling. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Neural Nets in Electric Fish , 1991 .

[20]  W. Heiligenberg,et al.  Development of the jamming avoidance response and its morphological correlates in the gymnotiform electric fish, Eigenmannia. , 1992, Journal of neurobiology.

[21]  H. Sullivan Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, 2nd Ed. , 1992, Neurology.

[22]  R Wilders,et al.  Beating irregularity of single pacemaker cells isolated from the rabbit sinoatrial node. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Michael L. Hines,et al.  NEURON — A Program for Simulation of Nerve Equations , 1993 .

[24]  Ernst,et al.  Synchronization induced by temporal delays in pulse-coupled oscillators. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[25]  Germán Mato,et al.  Synchrony in Excitatory Neural Networks , 1995, Neural Computation.

[26]  D. Spray Physiological Properties of Gap Junction Channels in the Nervous System , 1996 .

[27]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  The Monetary Transmission Mechanism in the United Kingdom: Pass-Through and Policy Rules. manuscript , 1996 .

[28]  B. Knight,et al.  Response variability and timing precision of neuronal spike trains in vivo. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  J. Spiro Differential activation of glutamate receptor subtypes on a single class of cells enables a neural oscillator to produce distinct behaviors. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  J. Juranek,et al.  Segregation of Behavior-Specific Synaptic Inputs to a Vertebrate Neuronal Oscillator , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Ruben Budelli,et al.  Electric fish measure distance in the dark , 1998, Nature.

[32]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Submicrosecond pacemaker precision is behaviorally modulated: the gymnotiform electromotor pathway. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Using variability to regulate long term biological rhythms. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Precision of the pacemaker nucleus in a weakly electric fish: network versus cellular influences. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  Dynamics of Spiking Neurons with Electrical Coupling , 2000, Neural Computation.