Orientation dependent modulation of apparent speed: psychophysical evidence

We report several experiments showing that a Gabor patch moving in apparent motion sequences appears much faster when its orientation is aligned with the motion path than when it is at an angle to it. This effect is very large and peaks at high speeds (64 degrees /s), decreases for higher and lower speeds and disappears at low speeds (4 degrees /s). This speed bias decreases as the angle between the motion axis and the orientation of the Gabor patch increases, but remains high for curvilinear paths, provided that element orientation is kept tangential to the motion trajectory. It is not accounted for by decision strategies relying on the overall length and duration of the motion sequence or the gap size (or spatial jump) between successive frames. We propose a simple explanation, thoroughly developed as a computational model in a companion paper (Seriès, Georges, Lorenceau & Frégnac: "Orientation dependent modulation of apparent speed: a model based on the dynamics of feedforward and horizontal connectivity in V1 cortex", this issue), according to which long-range horizontal connections in V1 elicit differential latency modulations in response to apparent motion sequences, whose read-out at an MT stage results in a perceptual speed bias. The consequences of these findings are discussed.

[1]  Axis of preferred motion is a function of bar length in visual cortical receptive fields , 1989 .

[2]  M. Morgan,et al.  How the human visual system encodes the orientation of a texture, and why it makes mistakes , 1997, Current Biology.

[3]  C. Li,et al.  Extensive integration field beyond the classical receptive field of cat's striate cortical neurons--classification and tuning properties. , 1994, Vision research.

[4]  S. McKee,et al.  Sequential recruitment in the discrimination of velocity. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Claude L. Fennema,et al.  Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects , 1979 .

[6]  F. Campbell,et al.  The influence of spatial frequency and contrast on the perception of moving patterns , 1981, Vision Research.

[7]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Perceptual grouping in the Ternus display: evidence for an `association field' in apparent motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[8]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[9]  V. Bringuier,et al.  The visual cortical association field: A Gestalt concept or a psychophysiological entity? , 2000, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[10]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Visual inertia in apparent motion , 1987, Vision Research.

[11]  H. Jones,et al.  Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities , 1995, Nature.

[12]  Prrmon Pms LIii,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING VELOCITY CODING IN THE HUMAN VISUAL SYSTEM , 2002 .

[13]  J. Nelson,et al.  Intracortical facilitation among co-oriented, co-axially aligned simple cells in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[15]  E. Castet,et al.  Temporal dynamics of motion integration for the initiation of tracking eye movements at ultra-short latencies , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[16]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[17]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction , 1999, Nature.

[18]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Contrast-sensitive perceptual grouping and object-based attention in the laminar circuits of primary visual cortex , 2000, Vision Research.

[19]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision , 1989, Nature.

[20]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  J. F. Brown.  The visual perception of velocity , 1931 .

[22]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[23]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Shifts in the Population Response in the Middle Temporal Visual Area Parallel Perceptual and Motor Illusions Produced by Apparent Motion , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Thompson.  Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast , 1982, Vision Research.

[25]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation , 1993, Vision Research.

[26]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Effects of element orientation on apparent motion perception , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[28]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Orientation bandwidth: The effect of spatial and temporal frequency , 1992, Vision Research.

[29]  S P McKee,et al.  Stimulus configuration determines the detectability of motion signals in noise. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Orientation dependent modulation of apparent speed: a model based on the dynamics of feed-forward and horizontal connectivity in V1 cortex , 2002, Vision Research.

[31]  Contrast dependence of high-speed apparent motion , 2000 .

[32]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Textured backgrounds alter perceived speed , 2000, Vision Research.

[33]  P. Verghese,et al.  Spatial Layout Affects Speed Discrimination , 1997, Vision Research.

[34]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[35]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. II. Spatiotemporal range of directional interactions in MT and V1. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[37]  P. Thompson,et al.  Human speed perception is contrast dependent , 1992, Vision Research.

[38]  S. Anstis,et al.  Illusory reversal of visual depth and movement during changes of contrast , 1975, Vision Research.

[39]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  Oriented Axon Projections in Primary Visual Cortex of the Monkey , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Functional topography of horizontal neuronal networks in cat visual cortex (area 18) , 1996 .

[41]  E. Wist,et al.  The spatial frequency effect on perceived velocity , 1976, Vision Research.

[42]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[43]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Visual Motion Sensation Yielded by Non-visually Driven Attention , 1997, Vision Research.

[44]  S. McKee,et al.  Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[45]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  B Moulden,et al.  Collator units: second-stage orientational filters. , 1994, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[47]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  Velocity invariance of preferred axis of motion for single spot stimuli in simple cells of cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. III. Psychophysics and physiology of apparent motion. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  D. Burr,et al.  Two-dimensional spatial and spatial-frequency selectivity of motion-sensitive mechanisms in human vision. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[50]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[51]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance , 1993, Vision Research.

[52]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Orientation, axis and direction as stimulus parameters for striate cells. , 1974, Vision research.

[54]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[55]  E. Adelson,et al.  Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex , 1992, Vision Research.

[56]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Inhomogeneity and anisotropies for motion detection in the monocular visual field of human observers , 1993, Vision Research.

[57]  F. Wörgötter,et al.  Axis of preferred motion is a function of bar length in visual cortical receptive fields , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  R. Frostig,et al.  Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[59]  W Singer,et al.  The Perceptual Grouping Criterion of Colinearity is Reflected by Anisotropies of Connections in the Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The European journal of neuroscience.

[60]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  C. Gilbert.  Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[62]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[63]  V. Bringuier,et al.  Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. , 1999, Science.

[64]  R. Hess,et al.  Orientation sensitivity in human visual motion processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[65]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  The effect of the spatial arrangement of target lines on perceived speed , 2001, Vision Research.

[66]  Jocelyn Faubert,et al.  The influence of two spatially distinct primers and attribute priming on motion induction , 1995, Vision Research.

[67]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines , 1993, Vision Research.

[68]  R. C. Emerson.  Quadrature subunits in directionally selective simple cells: Spatiotemporal interactions , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[69]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Generation of end-inhibition in the visual cortex via interlaminar connections , 1986, Nature.

[70]  T. Albright.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[72]  M. Morgan,et al.  Perceived diagonals in grids and lattices , 1989, Vision Research.

[73]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[74]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Motion direction signals in the primary visual cortex of cat and monkey. , 2001, Visual neuroscience.

[75]  S. McKee.  A local mechanism for differential velocity detection , 1981, Vision Research.

[76]  G. Orban,et al.  Response to movement of neurons in areas 17 and 18 of the cat: velocity sensitivity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[77]  J. Bullier,et al.  Response modulations by static texture surround in area V1 of the macaque monkey do not depend on feedback connections from V2. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.