Robotic On-Orbit Servicing - DLR's Experience and Perspective

The increasing number of launched satellites per year, calls for solutions to keep free operational space for telecommunication systems in geo-synchronized orbit, as well as to avoid the endangering of space systems in LEO (low-Earth orbit) and of the public living in the habited parts on Earth. Examples for such dangerous stranded space systems in the past are Skylab and MIR. In the future, the uncontrolled and accidental de-orbiting of other huge satellites is expected, where parts of these will hit the surface of the Earth. A feasible way to handle such problems might be to enforce the operational requirement to use some dedicated residual fuel for a controlled de-orbiting, or in case of GEO (geostationary orbit), to lift the satellites at their end of life into the graveyard orbit. Despite these measures, malfunctions of solar generators, control systems or thrusters cannot be avoided. Therefore, on-orbit servicing (OOS) will be a mandatory and challenging topic for space robotics in the near future. The outcome of national German projects like ROTEX, ESS and GETEX/ETS-VII represent a know-how which can be directly applied for the development of OOS-robotic systems. Control structures and several possible operational modes are discussed within this paper. The recently started national project ROKVISS already provides the necessary space-qualified hardware as well as the very powerful telepresence operational mode. The paper will concentrate on a description of the ROKVISS mission

[1]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  A passivity based Cartesian impedance controller for flexible joint robots - part II: full state feedback, impedance design and experiments , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[2]  Klaus Landzettel,et al.  ROKVISS - towards Telepresence Control in Advanced Space Missions , 2003 .

[3]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Grasp planning: how to choose a suitable task wrench space , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[4]  Bernd Schäfer,et al.  ROKVISS: Orbital Testbed for Tele-Presence Experiments, Novel Robotic Components and Dynamics Models Verification , 2004 .

[5]  Klaus Landzettel,et al.  System Prerequisites and Operational Modes for On Orbit Servicing , 2004 .

[6]  Klaus Landzettel,et al.  DLR on the way towards Telepresent On-Orbit Servicing , 2004 .

[7]  Bernd Schäfer,et al.  ROKVISS - Space Robotics Dynamics and Control Performance Experiments at the ISS , 2004 .

[8]  A. Albu-Schäffer Regelung von Robotern mit elastischen Gelenken am Beispiel der DLR-Leichtbauarme , 2002 .

[9]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  A passivity based Cartesian impedance controller for flexible joint robots - part I: torque feedback and gravity compensation , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[10]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  Wave Variables based Bilateral Control with a Time Delay Model for Space Robot Applications , 2004 .

[11]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  A globally stable state feedback controller for flexible joint robots , 2001, Adv. Robotics.

[12]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Cartesian impedance control techniques for torque controlled light-weight robots , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[13]  Klaus Landzettel,et al.  Robotics Component Verification on ISS ROKVISS - Preliminary Results for Telepresence , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  T Ortmaier Telepresence Issues in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2003 .