Controlling mRNA Translation

The ribosomal density along the coding region of the mRNA molecule affect various fundamental intracellular phenomena including: protein production rates, organismal fitness, ribosomal drop off, and co-translational protein folding. Thus, regulating translation in order to obtain a desired ribosomal profile along the mRNA molecule is an important biological problem. We study this problem using a model for mRNA translation, called the ribosome flow model (RFM). In the RFM, the mRNA molecule is modeled as chain of n sites. The n state-variables describe the ribosomal density profile along the mRNA molecule, whereas the transition rates from each site to the next are controlled by n+1 positive constants. To study the problem of controlling the density profile, we consider some or all of the transition rates as time-varying controls. We consider the following problem: given an initial and a desired ribosomal density profile, determine the time-varying values of the transition rates that steer the RFM to this density profile, if they exist. Specifically, we consider two control problems. In the first, all transition rates can be regulated and the goal is to steer the ribosomal density profile and the protein production rate from a given initial value to a desired value. In the second, a single transition rate is controlled and the goal is to steer the production rate to a desired value. In the first case, we show that the system is controllable, i.e. the control is powerful enough to steer the RFM to any desired value, and we provide closed-form expressions for constant control functions (or transition rates) asymptotically steering the RFM to the desired value. For the second problem, we show that the production rate can be steered to any desired value in a feasible region determined by the other, constant transition rates. We discuss some of the biological implications of these results.

[1]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  Entrainment to Periodic Initiation and Transition Rates in a Computational Model for Gene Translation , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  Fred Brauer,et al.  Compartmental Models in Epidemiology , 2008, Mathematical Epidemiology.

[3]  M. Margaliot,et al.  Maximizing protein translation rate in the non-homogeneous ribosome flow model: a convex optimization approach , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  T. Tuller,et al.  A comparative genomics study on the effect of individual amino acids on ribosome stalling , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[5]  A Fahr,et al.  Compartment modeling. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[6]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Determinants of Protein Abundance and Translation Efficiency in S. cerevisiae , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Isaac Meilijson,et al.  Genome-Scale Analysis of Translation Elongation with a Ribosome Flow Model , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  L. E. Becker,et al.  On self-propulsion of micro-machines at low Reynolds number: Purcell's three-link swimmer , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  On the Ribosomal Density that Maximizes Protein Translation Rate , 2016, PloS one.

[10]  Nicolae Radu Zabet,et al.  A novel and versatile computational tool to model translation , 2012, Bioinform..

[11]  E. O’Shea,et al.  An Integrated Approach Reveals Regulatory Controls on Bacterial Translation Elongation , 2014, Cell.

[12]  Roded Sharan,et al.  TP53 cancerous mutations exhibit selection for translation efficiency. , 2009, Cancer research.

[13]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems , 1990 .

[14]  Alexander Olshevsky,et al.  Minimal Controllability Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[15]  John A. Jacquez,et al.  Qualitative Theory of Compartmental Systems , 1993, SIAM Rev..

[16]  Tamir Tuller,et al.  Efficient Manipulations of Synonymous Mutations for Controlling Translation Rate: An Analytical Approach , 2012, J. Comput. Biol..

[17]  Zoya Ignatova,et al.  Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[18]  B. F. Doolin,et al.  Large scale dynamic systems , 1975 .

[19]  Chen Yanover,et al.  Building better drugs: developing and regulating engineered therapeutic proteins. , 2013, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[20]  Debashish Chowdhury,et al.  Stochastic Transport in Complex Systems: From Molecules to Vehicles , 2010 .

[21]  Reinhard Lipowsky,et al.  Effect of ribosome shielding on mRNA stability , 2013, Physical biology.

[22]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  A model for competition for ribosomes in the cell , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  G Pohl,et al.  Expression of human insulin-like growth factor I in bacteria: use of optimized gene fusion vectors to facilitate protein purification. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[24]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  Ribosome Flow Model on a Ring , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[25]  Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S8 Table S1 Movies S1 to S3 a " Silent " Polymorphism in the Mdr1 Gene Changes Substrate Specificity Corrected 30 November 2007; See Last Page , 2022 .

[26]  M. Margaliot,et al.  Sensitivity of mRNA Translation , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Ching-tai Lin.  Structural controllability , 1974 .

[28]  Kim Sneppen,et al.  The functional half-life of an mRNA depends on the ribosome spacing in an early coding region. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Vassily Hatzimanikatis,et al.  A Genome-Scale Integration and Analysis of Lactococcus lactis Translation Data , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  Ran Elkon,et al.  p53 induces transcriptional and translational programs to suppress cell proliferation and growth , 2013, Genome Biology.

[31]  Naomi R Wray,et al.  Translation elongation factor eEF1A2 is a potential oncoprotein that is overexpressed in two-thirds of breast tumours , 2005, BMC Cancer.

[32]  L. E. Johnson,et al.  Control and controllability in compartmental systems , 1976 .

[33]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Monotone Dynamical Systems: An Introduction To The Theory Of Competitive And Cooperative Systems (Mathematical Surveys And Monographs) By Hal L. Smith , 1995 .

[34]  R. Jackson,et al.  The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[35]  John D. Storey,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[37]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  Mistranslation-Induced Protein Misfolding as a Dominant Constraint on Coding-Sequence Evolution , 2008, Cell.

[38]  Izhak Bucher,et al.  On the slow dynamics of near-field acoustically levitated objects under High excitation frequencies , 2015 .

[39]  C. Scorer,et al.  Foreign gene expression in yeast: a review , 1992, Yeast.

[40]  J. Jacquez.  Compartmental analysis in biology and medicine , 1985 .

[41]  C. Kurland,et al.  Translational accuracy and the fitness of bacteria. , 1992, Annual review of genetics.

[42]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  The translational landscape of mTOR signalling steers cancer initiation and metastasis , 2012, Nature.

[43]  Tamir Tuller,et al.  Predictive biophysical modeling and understanding of the dynamics of mRNA translation and its evolution , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  Kelvin H. Lee,et al.  Totally asymmetric exclusion process with extended objects: a model for protein synthesis. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  Ribosome flow model with positive feedback , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[46]  Tamir Tuller,et al.  Determinants of Translation Elongation Speed and Ribosomal Profiling Biases in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[47]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Mathematical control theory: deterministic finite dimensional systems (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[48]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  D. I. Stewart,et al.  Heterologous biopharmaceutical protein expression in Streptomyces. , 1997, Trends in biotechnology.

[50]  J. Belasco,et al.  Lost in translation: the influence of ribosomes on bacterial mRNA decay. , 2005, Genes & development.

[51]  Masami Ito,et al.  On the structural controllability of compartmental systems , 1984 .

[52]  R. A. Blythe,et al.  Nonequilibrium steady states of matrix-product form: a solver's guide , 2007, 0706.1678.

[53]  E. Purcell.  Life at Low Reynolds Number , 2008 .

[54]  Tamir Tuller,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of Ribosomal Density on mRNA Stability , 2014, PloS one.

[55]  Tamir Tuller,et al.  New Universal Rules of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Fidelity , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  Judith Frydman,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of codon optimality reveals hidden signatures of co-translational folding , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[57]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Rate-Limiting Steps in Yeast Protein Translation , 2013, Cell.

[58]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  Stability Analysis of the Ribosome Flow Model , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[59]  B. Schmittmann,et al.  Modeling Translation in Protein Synthesis with TASEP: A Tutorial and Recent Developments , 2011, 1108.3312.

[60]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  Accurate prediction of cellular co-translational folding indicates proteins can switch from post- to co-translational folding , 2016, Nature Communications.

[61]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  Controlling the ribosomal density profile in mRNA translation , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[62]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  Explicit Expression for the Steady-State Translation Rate in the Infinite-Dimensional Homogeneous Ribosome Flow Model , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[63]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[64]  H. Mayeda,et al.  Strong Structural Controllability , 1979 .

[65]  Guy-Bart Stan,et al.  Modelling essential interactions between synthetic genes and their chassis cell , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[66]  T. Tuller,et al.  Multiple roles of the coding sequence 5′ end in gene expression regulation , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[67]  G. Dougan,et al.  Cooperation Between Translating Ribosomes and RNA Polymerase in Transcription Elongation , 2010, Science.

[68]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Automated Design of Synthetic Ribosome Binding Sites to Precisely Control Protein Expression , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[69]  Tamar Unger,et al.  A Recombinant Collagen–mRNA Platform for Controllable Protein Synthesis , 2015, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.