Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorisation of Natural and Artifactual Objects

Visual processing is known to be very fast in ultra-rapid categorisation tasks where the subject has to decide whether a briefly flashed image belongs to a target category or not. Human subjects can respond in under 400 ms, and event-related-potential studies have shown that the underlying processing can be done in less than 150 ms. Monkeys trained to perform the same task have proved even faster. However, most of these experiments have only been done with biologically relevant target categories such as animals or food. Here we performed the same study on human subjects, alternating between a task in which the target category was ‘animal’, and a task in which the target category was ‘means of transport’. These natural images of clearly artificial objects contained targets as varied as cars, trucks, trains, boats, aircraft, and hot-air balloons. However, the subjects performed almost identically in both tasks, with reaction times not significantly longer in the ‘means of transport’ task. These reaction times were much shorter than in any previous study on natural-image processing. We conclude that, at least for these two superordinate categories, the speed of ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural scenes does not depend on the target category, and that this processing could rely primarily on feed-forward, automatic mechanisms.

[1]  Martin Fieder,et al.  Categorical learning in pigeons: the role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli , 1999, Vision Research.

[2]  Y. Ejima,et al.  Simple reaction time to sinusoidal grating and perceptual integration time: Contributions of perceptual and response processes , 1987, Vision Research.

[3]  Neill W. Campbell,et al.  Automatic Segmentation and Classification of Outdoor Images Using Neural Networks , 1997, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[4]  R. Vogels Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single‐cell study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Cerebral cortical mechanisms of reaching movements. , 1992, Science.

[6]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials , 1999 .

[7]  A. Aubertin,et al.  Catégorisation visuelle rapide et vitesse de traitement chez le migraineux , 1999 .

[8]  R. Vogels Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 1: behavioural study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  G. Murphy,et al.  Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Denis Fize,et al.  Rapid categorization of extrafoveal natural images: impplications for biological models , 1998 .

[13]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Simple reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of transient and sustained channels , 1975, Vision Research.

[14]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach , 1999, Psychological research.

[15]  P. Lennie The physiological basis of variations in visual latency , 1981, Vision Research.

[16]  R Van Rullen,et al.  Face processing using one spike per neurone. , 1998, Bio Systems.

[17]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  N Fabre,et al.  [Fast visual categorization and speed of processing in migraine]. , 1999, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[19]  D. Perrett,et al.  Time course of neural responses discriminating different views of the face and head. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  G Richard,et al.  Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Categorisation of complex natural images in extreme peripheral vision , 1999 .

[22]  S. Thorpe,et al.  A Limit to the Speed of Processing in Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorization of Novel Natural Scenes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[24]  Anne Marie Aubertin Migraine and speed of processing in fast visual categorisation , 1999 .

[25]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys , 1998, Neuroreport.

[26]  Jacques Gautrais,et al.  SpikeNET: A simulator for modeling large networks of integrate and fire neurons , 1999, Neurocomputing.