Illusory percepts from auditory adaptation.

Phenomena resembling tinnitus and Zwicker phantom tone are seen to result from an auditory gain adaptation mechanism that attempts to make full use of a fixed-capacity channel. In the case of tinnitus, the gain adaptation enhances internal noise of a frequency band otherwise silent due to damage. This generates a percept of a phantom sound as a consequence of hearing loss. In the case of Zwicker tone, a frequency band is temporarily silent during the presentation of a notched broadband sound, resulting in a percept of a tone at the notched frequency. The model suggests a link between tinnitus and the Zwicker tone percept, in that it predicts different results for normal and tinnitus subjects due to a loss of instantaneous nonlinear compression. Listening experiments on 44 subjects show that tinnitus subjects (11 of 44) are significantly more likely to hear the Zwicker tone. This psychoacoustic experiment establishes the first empirical link between the Zwicker tone percept and tinnitus. Together with the modeling results, this supports the hypothesis that the phantom percept is a consequence of a central adaptation mechanism confronted with a degraded sensory apparatus.

[1]  Richard Kempter,et al.  Course of hearing loss and occurrence of tinnitus , 2006, Hearing Research.

[2]  Mandy Hill,et al.  An Overview of Binaural Advantages for Children and Adults Who Use Binaural/Bimodal Hearing Devices , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  Richard Kempter,et al.  Development of tinnitus‐related neuronal hyperactivity through homeostatic plasticity after hearing loss: a computational model , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Nonlinear image representation for efficient perceptual coding , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  I. Dean,et al.  Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Peter G. Gillespie,et al.  Hair-Cell Mechanotransduction and Cochlear Amplification , 2005, Neuron.

[8]  D. McAlpine,et al.  GABAergic Inhibition Controls Neural Gain in Inferior Colliculus Neurons Sensitive to Interaural Time Differences , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. P. Bacon,et al.  Compression estimates using behavioral and otoacoustic emission measures , 2005, Hearing Research.

[10]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  The role of spiking nonlinearity in contrast gain control and information transmission , 2005, Vision Research.

[11]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Enriched Acoustic Environment after Noise Trauma Reduces Hearing Loss and Prevents Cortical Map Reorganization , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Mann,et al.  DPOAE-Grams in Patients with Acute Tonal Tinnitus , 2003, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  M. Kössl,et al.  Auditory sensitization during the perception of acoustical negative afterimages: Analogies to visual processing? , 1995, Naturwissenschaften.

[14]  G. Hesse,et al.  Specific findings in distortion product otoacoustic emissions and growth functions with chronic tinnitus. , 2005, The international tinnitus journal.

[15]  R Stoop,et al.  Two-tone suppression and combination tone generation as computations performed by the Hopf cochlea. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[16]  J. Eggermont,et al.  The neuroscience of tinnitus , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  D. McAlpine,et al.  Spike-frequency adaptation in the inferior colliculus. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Eric D Young,et al.  Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Flores-Otero,et al.  Firing Patterns of Type II Spiral Ganglion Neurons In Vitro , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  N. Quaranta,et al.  Tinnitus and cochlear implantation , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[21]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Short-term adaptation and incremental responses of single auditory-nerve fibers , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  D. Robertson,et al.  Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  F. A. Suzuki,et al.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in tinnitus patients. , 2004, The international tinnitus journal.

[24]  M. Liberman,et al.  Modulation of cochlear afferent response by the lateral olivocochlear system: activation via electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Navarro,et al.  Optimal coding through divisive normalization models of V1 neurons. , 2003 .

[26]  C. Formby,et al.  Adaptive plasticity of loudness induced by chronic attenuation and enhancement of the acoustic background. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Richard Kempter,et al.  Zwicker tone illusion and noise reduction in the auditory system. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[28]  Laurel H. Carney,et al.  Quantifying the Information in Auditory-Nerve Responses for Level Discrimination , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[29]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Neural Correlates of an Auditory Afterimage in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[30]  R. Navarro,et al.  Optimal coding through divisive normalization models of V1 neurons , 2003, Network.

[31]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Lionel Collet,et al.  Psychoacoustic Characterization of the Tinnitus Spectrum: Implications for the Underlying Mechanisms of Tinnitus , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[33]  D. Baguley,et al.  Mechanisms of tinnitus. , 2002, British medical bulletin.

[34]  G. Langner,et al.  Evidence for interactions across frequency channels in the inferior colliculus of awake chinchilla , 2002, Hearing Research.

[35]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Ray Meddis,et al.  A revised model of the inner-hair cell and auditory-nerve complex. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  T. Duke,et al.  Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  William M. Hartmann,et al.  Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 2001 .

[39]  M. Lenhardt,et al.  Long-term inhibition of tinnitus by UltraQuiet therapy: preliminary report. , 2001, The international tinnitus journal.

[40]  C. Micheyl,et al.  An auditory negative after-image as a human model of tinnitus , 2000, Hearing Research.

[41]  A. Hudspeth,et al.  Putting ion channels to work: mechanoelectrical transduction, adaptation, and amplification by hair cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Aage R. Møller,et al.  Hearing: Its Physiology and Pathophysiology , 2000 .

[43]  A. Hudspeth,et al.  Essential nonlinearities in hearing. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[44]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity estimated by pulsation threshold. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Higher-Order Statistical Properties Arising from the Non-Stationarity of Natural Signals , 2000, NIPS.

[46]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[47]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Organization of inhibitory frequency receptive fields in cat primary auditory cortex. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Israel Nelken,et al.  Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.

[49]  B. Ross,et al.  Auditory afterimage: Tonotopic representation in the auditory cortex , 1998, Neuroreport.

[50]  T. Janssen,et al.  Growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  N. Fujiki,et al.  Characteristics of DPOAE audiogram in tinnitus patients , 1997, Hearing Research.

[52]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  E M Relkin,et al.  Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  V. Vesterager Fortnightly review: tinnitus—investigation and management , 1997, BMJ.

[55]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[56]  G. M. Gerken,et al.  Central tinnitus and lateral inhibition: an auditory brainstem model , 1996, Hearing Research.

[57]  A Kral,et al.  On lateral inhibition in the auditory system. , 1996, General physiology and biophysics.

[58]  J. Guinan Physiology of Olivocochlear Efferents , 1996 .

[59]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[60]  T. Creedon,et al.  Psychophysical Tuning Curves in Subjects with Tinnitus Suggest Outer Hair Cell Lesions , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[61]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  Cooper Jc Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1971-75: Part II. Tinnitus, subjective hearing loss, and well-being. , 1994 .

[63]  J. C. Cooper,et al.  Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1971-75: Part II. Tinnitus, subjective hearing loss, and well-being. , 1994, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[64]  A R Palmer,et al.  Intensity coding in low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers of the guinea pig. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  D. W. Robinson,et al.  Psychoacoustics—facts and models , 1991 .

[66]  Robert P Carlyon,et al.  Changes in the masked thresholds of brief tones produced by prior bursts of noise , 1989, Hearing Research.

[67]  John J. Guinan,et al.  Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. I. Rate-level functions , 1988, Hearing Research.

[68]  M J Penner,et al.  Magnitude estimation and the "paradoxical" loudness of tinnitus. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[69]  P Dallos,et al.  Response characteristics of mammalian cochlear hair cells , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[70]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses , 1984, Hearing Research.

[71]  R. Tyler,et al.  Masking of tinnitus compared to masking of pure tones. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[72]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Parametric studies of tinnitus masking and residual inhibition. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[73]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex , 1982, Nature.

[74]  Austen Clark,et al.  Psychological Models and Neural Mechanisms. , 1982 .

[75]  R V Harrison,et al.  Rate-versus-intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[76]  M. J. Penner Two-tone forward masking patterns and tinnitus. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[77]  R. Shannon,et al.  Psychophysical measurements relating suppression and combination tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  R. Shapley,et al.  The contrast gain control of the cat retina , 1979, Vision Research.

[79]  B. Moore An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[80]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[81]  N. Guttman,et al.  Exploratory studies of Zwicker's "negative afterimage" in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[82]  E. Zwicker “Negative Afterimage” in Hearing , 1964 .

[83]  H. Barlow,et al.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[84]  B H SHUSTER,et al.  Physiology of the ear. , 1952, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[85]  G. Miller,et al.  An Auditory Afterimage? , 1947, Science.