Rats with damage to the hippocampal-formation are impaired on the transverse-patterning problem but not on elemental discriminations.

We assessed the effects of hippocampal-formation (HF) damage on the rat's ability to learn two sets of concurrent visual discriminations. Each set included three problems. One set, called the transverse-patterning problem, was constructed so that each choice stimulus was ambiguous; sometimes it was the correct (+) and sometimes it was the incorrect (-) choice as follows: A+ vs. B-, B+ vs. C-, and C+ vs. A-. It could not be solved unless rats used configural associations. The stimuli were not ambiguous in the second, elemental problem set, A+ vs. B-, C+ vs. D-, and E+ vs. F-. Rats could solve this set without the use of configural associations. Rats with HF damage solved the set of elemental problems, but their performance on the transverse-patterning problem was impaired. These results support Sutherland and Rudy's (1989) theory that the hippocampal formation is critical for the acquisition of configural associations.

[1]  J. Pearce,et al.  Configural associations in discrimination learning. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  E. Kehoe.  A layered network model of associative learning: learning to learn and configuration. , 1988, Psychological review.

[3]  Richard Hirsh,et al.  The hippocampus, conditional operations, and cognition , 1980 .

[4]  J. W. Rudy,et al.  Some properties of configural learning: An investigation of the transverse-patterning problem. , 1992 .

[5]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Damage to the hippocampal formation in rats selectively impairs the ability to learn cue relationships. , 1989, Behavioral and neural biology.

[6]  G. Handelmann,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and memory , 1979 .

[7]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The hippocampus--what does it do? , 1992, Behavioral and neural biology.

[8]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  P. Holland,et al.  Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage , 1992, Hippocampus.

[10]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.

[11]  R. Hirsh.  The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: a theory. , 1974, Behavioral biology.

[12]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[13]  C. B. Woodbury.  The learning of stimulus patterns by dogs. , 1943 .

[14]  Kenneth W. Spence,et al.  The nature of the response in discrimination learning. , 1952 .

[15]  M. McKERNAN,et al.  Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: a challenge to configural association theory. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  Lawrence Weiskrantz,et al.  The effects of fornix transection and combined fornix transection, mammillary body lesions and hippocampal ablations on object-pair association memory in the rhesus monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  R. Sutherland,et al.  The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  R. Thompson.  Approach-avoidance in an ambivalent object discrimination problem. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .