A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem

The forward electroencephalography (EEG) problem involves finding a potential V from the Poisson equation /spl nabla//spl middot/(/spl sigma//spl nabla/V)=f, in which f represents electrical sources in the brain, and /spl sigma/ the conductivity of the head tissues. In the piecewise constant conductivity head model, this can be accomplished by the boundary element method (BEM) using a suitable integral formulation. Most previous work uses the same integral formulation, corresponding to a double-layer potential. We present a conceptual framework based on a well-known theorem (Theorem 1) that characterizes harmonic functions defined on the complement of a bounded smooth surface. This theorem says that such harmonic functions are completely defined by their values and those of their normal derivatives on this surface. It allows us to cast the previous BEM approaches in a unified setting and to develop two new approaches corresponding to different ways of exploiting the same theorem. Specifically, we first present a dual approach which involves a single-layer potential. Then, we propose a symmetric formulation, which combines single- and double-layer potentials, and which is new to the field of EEG, although it has been applied to other problems in electromagnetism. The three methods have been evaluated numerically using a spherical geometry with known analytical solution, and the symmetric formulation achieves a significantly higher accuracy than the alternative methods. Additionally, we present results with realistically shaped meshes. Beside providing a better understanding of the foundations of BEM methods, our approach appears to lead also to more efficient algorithms.

[1]  J. Nédélec Acoustic and electromagnetic equations , 2001 .

[2]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Partial differential equations in biology , 1976 .

[3]  A. S. Ferguson,et al.  A complete linear discretization for calculating the magnetic field using the boundary element method , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D L Jewett,et al.  Insidious errors in dipole localization parameters at a single time-point due to model misspecification of number of shells. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Jacob K. White,et al.  A precorrected-FFT method for electrostatic analysis of complicated 3-D structures , 1997, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[6]  Robert Modre,et al.  On modeling the Wilson terminal in the boundary and finite element method , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Jyrki Lötjönen,et al.  Construction of boundary element models in bioelectromagnetism , 2000 .

[8]  Leonard J. Gray,et al.  Symmetric Galerkin boundary integral formulation for interface and multi-zone problems , 1997 .

[9]  James N. Lyness,et al.  Moderate degree symmetric quadrature rules for the triangle j inst maths , 1975 .

[10]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[11]  D. Geselowitz On bioelectric potentials in an inhomogeneous volume conductor. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[12]  D. Wilton,et al.  Potential integrals for uniform and linear source distributions on polygonal and polyhedral domains , 1984 .

[13]  J. A. Gubner,et al.  Differential Equations , 1991, Nature.

[14]  D. Geselowitz On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources , 1970 .

[15]  Marc Bonnet,et al.  Equations intégrales et éléments de frontière , 1995 .

[16]  C. DeWitt-Morette,et al.  Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology , 1990 .

[17]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  J. D. Munck The potential distribution in a layered anisotropic spheroidal volume conductor , 1988 .

[19]  S. Tissari,et al.  A precorrected-fFT method to accelerate the solution of the forward problem in magnetoencephalography. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[21]  C. Babiloni,et al.  Combined high resolution EEG and MEG data for linear inverse estimate of human event-related cortical activity , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[22]  Richard Barrett,et al.  Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods , 1994, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics.

[23]  J. H. Kane,et al.  A symmetric Galerkin multi‐zone boundary element formulation , 1997 .

[24]  M. E. Spencer,et al.  A Study of Dipole Localization Accuracy for MEG and EEG using a Human Skull Phantom , 1998, NeuroImage.

[25]  T. Chan Deflated Decomposition of Solutions of Nearly Singular Systems , 1984 .

[26]  R. V. Uitert,et al.  Can a Spherical Model Substitute for a Realistic Head Model in Forward and Inverse MEG Simulations ? , 2002 .

[27]  O. Faugeras,et al.  The Inverse EEG and MEG Problems : The Adjoint State Approach I: The Continuous Case , 1999 .

[28]  N. G. Gencer,et al.  Forward problem solution of electromagnetic source imaging using a new BEM formulation with high-order elements. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  R M Leahy,et al.  Imaging neural activity using MEG and EEG. , 1997, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[30]  Manfred Fuchs,et al.  Numerical aspects of spatio-temporal current density reconstruction from EEG-/MEG-data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[31]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Snorre H. Christiansen Résolution des équations intégrales pour la diffraction d'ondes acoustiques et électromagnétiques - Stabilisation d'algorithmes itératifs et aspects de l'analyse numérique , 2002 .

[33]  J. Rahola Iterative Solution of Dense Linear Systems , 2007 .

[34]  J. D. Munck A linear discretization of the volume conductor boundary integral equation using analytically integrated elements (electrophysiology application) , 1992 .

[35]  Amanda L. Kaas,et al.  A fast method to derive realistic BEM models for E/MEG source reconstruction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[36]  Z. Zhang,et al.  A fast method to compute surface potentials generated by dipoles within multilayer anisotropic spheres. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  The fast multipole method for the direct E/MEG problem , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[38]  John C. Mosher,et al.  Matrix Kernels for the Forward Problem in EEG and MEG , 1998 .

[39]  R. Leahy,et al.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  S. Tissari,et al.  A Precorrected-FFT Method to Accelerate the Solution of the Forward Problem in MEG , 2001 .

[41]  A. S. Ferguson,et al.  Factors affecting the accuracy of the boundary element method in the forward problem. I. Calculating surface potentials , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Satu Tissari,et al.  Iterative solution of dense linear systems arising from the electrostatic integral equation in MEG. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  Onno W. Weier,et al.  On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method (EEG application) , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  Jussi Rahola,et al.  Error Analysis of a New Galerkin Method to Solve the Forward Problem in MEG and EEG Using the Bounda , 1998 .