On Similarity Measures for Spike Trains

A variety of (dis)similarity measures for one-dimensional point processes (e.g., spike trains) are investigated, including the Victor-Purpura distance metric, the van Rossum distance metric, the Schreiber et al. similarity measure, the Hunter-Milton similarity measure, the event synchronization proposed by Quiroga, and the stochastic event synchrony measures (SES) recently proposed by Dauwels et al. By analyzing surrogate data, it is demonstrated that most measures are not able to distinguish timing precision and event reliability, i.e., they depend on both aspects of synchrony. There are two exceptions: with appropriate choice of parameters, event synchronization quantifies event reliability, independently of timing precision; the two SES parameters quantify both timing precision and event reliability separately. Before one can apply the (dis)similarity measures (with the exception of SES), one needs to determine potential lags between the point processes. On the other hand, SES deals with lags in a natural and direct way, and therefore, the SES similarity measures are robust to lags. As an illustration, neuronal spike data generated by the Morris-Lecar neuron model is considered.

[1]  C. Morris,et al.  Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[2]  E. Vaadia,et al.  Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Metric-space analysis of spike trains: theory, algorithms and application , 1998, q-bio/0309031.

[4]  Boris S. Gutkin,et al.  Dynamics of Membrane Excitability Determine Interspike Interval Variability: A Link Between Spike Generation Mechanisms and Cortical Spike Train Statistics , 1998, Neural Computation.

[5]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  A Novel Spike Distance , 2001, Neural Computation.

[6]  J. White,et al.  Frequency selectivity of layer II stellate cells in the medial entorhinal cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Event synchronization: a simple and fast method to measure synchronicity and time delay patterns. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  J. D. Hunter,et al.  Amplitude and frequency dependence of spike timing: implications for dynamic regulation. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Paul H. E. Tiesinga,et al.  A New Correlation-Based Measure of Spike Timing Reliability , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[10]  H. Robinson The Biophysical Basis of Firing Variability in Cortical Neurons , 2003 .

[11]  Paul H. E. Tiesinga,et al.  Rapid Temporal Modulation of Synchrony by Competition in Cortical Interneuron Networks , 2004, Neural Computation.

[12]  W. Singer,et al.  Neural Synchrony in Brain Disorders: Relevance for Cognitive Dysfunctions and Pathophysiology , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  G. Buzsáki Rhythms of the brain , 2006 .

[14]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Computational neuroscience , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  W. Singer,et al.  Modulation of Neuronal Interactions Through Neuronal Synchronization , 2007, Science.

[16]  Antonio Politi,et al.  Measuring spike train synchrony , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Measuring Neural Synchrony by Message Passing , 2007, NIPS.

[18]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Regulation of spike timing in visual cortical circuits , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Quantifying Statistical Interdependence by Message Passing on Graphs—Part I: One-Dimensional Point Processes , 2009, Neural Computation.