Prize-Collecting Data Fusion for Cost-Performance Tradeoff in Distributed Inference

A novel formulation for optimal sensor selection and in-network fusion for distributed inference known as the prize- collecting data fusion (PCDF) is proposed in terms of optimal tradeoff between the costs of aggregating the selected set of sensor measurements and the resulting inference performance at the fusion center. For i.i.d. measurements, PCDF reduces to the prize-collecting Steiner tree (PCST) with the single-letter Kullback-Leibler divergence as the penalty at each node, as the number of nodes goes to infinity. PCDF is then analyzed under a correlation model specified by a Markov random field (MRF) with a given dependency graph. For a special class of dependency graphs, a constrained version of the PCDF reduces to the PCST on an augmented graph. In this case, an approximation algorithm is given with the approximation ratio depending only on the number of profitable cliques in the dependency graph. Based on these results, two heuristics are proposed for node selection under general correlation structure, and their performance is studied via simulations.

[1]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Optimal Node Density for Detection in Energy-Constrained Random Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Cost-performance tradeoff in multi-hop aggregation for statistical inference , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[3]  John Odentrantz,et al.  Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues , 2000, Technometrics.

[4]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  Spatial cluster modelling , 2002 .

[5]  Patrick Billingsley,et al.  Probability and Measure. , 1986 .

[6]  Lang Tong,et al.  Cooperative routing for distributed detection in large sensor networks , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Anthony N. Pettitt,et al.  A Conditional Autoregressive Gaussian Process for Irregularly Spaced Multivariate Data with Application to Modelling Large Sets of Binary Data , 2002, Stat. Comput..

[8]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  The sensor selection problem for bounded uncertainty sensing models , 2005 .

[9]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  Goal-oriented optimal subset selection of correlated multimedia streams , 2007, TOMCCAP.

[10]  C. Guestrin,et al.  Near-optimal sensor placements: maximizing information while minimizing communication cost , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[11]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Minimum Cost Data Aggregation with Localized Processing for Statistical Inference , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[12]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[13]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Data Fusion , 1996 .

[14]  Dinesh Verma,et al.  A survey of sensor selection schemes in wireless sensor networks , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  On a stochastic sensor selection algorithm with applications in sensor scheduling and sensor coverage , 2006, Autom..

[16]  K. J. Ray Liu,et al.  Routing for Statistical Inference in Sensor Networks , 2009 .

[17]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[18]  David P. Williamson,et al.  A general approximation technique for constrained forest problems , 1992, SODA '92.

[19]  Shengbing Jiang,et al.  Optimal sensor selection for discrete-event systems with partial observation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[20]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  Computing and communicating functions over sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Po-Ning Chen General formulas for the Neyman-Pearson type-II error exponent subject to fixed and exponential type-I error bounds , 1996, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[22]  Stéphane Lafortune,et al.  On an Optimization Problem in Sensor Selection* , 2002, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[23]  Kenji Tei,et al.  Region-Based Sensor Selection for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing (sutc 2008).

[24]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  How Dense Should a Sensor Network Be for Detection With Correlated Observations? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[25]  Mauricio G. C. Resende,et al.  Strong lower bounds for the prize collecting Steiner problem in graphs , 2004, Discret. Appl. Math..

[26]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Routing for Statistical Inference in Sensor Networks , 2009 .

[27]  A. Ephremides,et al.  Energy-driven detection scheme with guaranteed accuracy , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[28]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Sensor Selection via Convex Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.