The evolution of exploitation and honesty in animal communication: a model using artificial neural networks.

Conflicts of interest arise between signaller and receiver in most kinds of biological communication. Some authors have argued that this conflict is likely to give rise to deceit and exploitation, as receivers lag behind in the coevolutionary 'arms race' with signallers. Others have argued that such manipulation is likely to be short-lived and that receivers can avoid being deceived by paying attention to signals that are costly and hence 'unfakeable.' These two views have been hard to reconcile. Here, we present results from simulations of signal evolution using artificial neural networks, which demonstrate that honesty can coexist with a degree of exploitation. Signal cost ensures that receivers are able to obtain some honest information, but is unable to prevent exploitative signalling strategies from gaining short-term benefits. Although any one receiver bias that is open to exploitation will subsist for only a short period of time once signallers begin to take advantage of it, new preferences of this kind are constantly regenerated through selection and random drift. Hidden preferences and sensory exploitation are thus likely to have an enduring influence on the evolution of honest, costly signals. At the same time, honesty and cost are prerequisites for the evolution of exploitation. When signalling is cost-free, selection cannot act to maintain honesty, and receivers rapidly evolve to ignore signals. This leads to a reduction in the extent of hidden preference, and a consequent loss of potential for exploitation.

[1]  R. Johnstone Honest signalling, perceptual error and the evolution of ‘all-or-nothing’ displays , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  J. Maynard Smith,et al.  Must reliable signals always be costly? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  M. Pagel Honest signalling among gametes , 1993, Nature.

[4]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Song, sexual selection, starvation and strategic handicaps , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection and signal evolution : the ghost of biases past , 1993 .

[6]  M. Enquist,et al.  Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals , 1993 .

[7]  J. Endler Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  R A Johnstone,et al.  Why we need ESS signalling theory. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  M. Enquist,et al.  Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses , 1993, Nature.

[10]  H. Proctor Sensory exploitation and the evolution of male mating behaviour: a cladistic test using water mites (Acari: Parasitengona) , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  A. Grafen,et al.  Error-prone signalling , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[13]  H. Proctor Courtship in the water mite Neumania papillator: males capitalize on female adaptations for predation , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek , 1991, Nature.

[15]  A. Grafen Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  M. Ryan,et al.  THE SENSORY BASIS OF SEXUAL SELECTION FOR COMPLEX CALLS IN THE TÚNGARA FROG, PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS (SEXUAL SELECTION FOR SENSORY EXPLOITATION) , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  M Andersson,et al.  Why are there so many threat displays? , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  R. Dawkins,et al.  Animal signals: information or manipulation? , 1978 .

[19]  A. Zahavi The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.