Dynamical and connectionist approaches to development: toward a future of mutually beneficial co-evolution

Book Synopsis: The book combines introductory chapters, detailed case studies, and commentaries from leading scholars in the field. There is a strong focus on the processes and mechanisms underlying developmental change. Thus, the book should be relevant to a broad readership in developmental science. Commentaries are included from researchers within this domain of expertise as well as from outside this are. This includes non-modelers as well as researchers from other theoretical traditions (e.g., developmental systems theory/developmental psychobiology). Has a strong interdisciplinary component with ties to computer science, neuroscience, education, and cognitive science. From William James to Sigmund Freud to Jean Piaget to B.F. Skinner, scholars (and parents!) have wondered how children move from the blooming, buzzing confusion of infancy, through the tumult of childhood and adolescence, into adulthood. Does development occur continuously over time or in a series of dramatic stages? Is development driven by learning or by biological maturational processes? What is the nature of experience, and how does it generate change? The study of development has always been organized around these big questions. And answers to these questions have a profound influence on daily life, forming a framework for how parents think about their own children, and influencing both national policy and educational curricula. This book defines and refines two major theoretical approaches within developmental science that address the central issues of development-connectionism and dynamical systems theory. Spencer, Thomas, and McClelland have brought together chapters that provide an introduction, overview, and critical evaluation of each approach, including three sets of case studies that illustrate how both approaches have been used to study topics ranging from early motor development to the acquisition of grammar. They also present a collection of commentaries by leading scholars, which offer a critical view from both an "outsiders" and an "insiders" perspective. The book is unique in the range of its treatment-it begins to delineate how developmental science can incorporate advances within neuroscience and computational modeling, and brings the new ideas of connectionism and dynamic systems theory into sharper focus, clarifying their usefulness and explanatory power.

[1]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[2]  C. Campbell,et al.  On Being There , 1965 .

[3]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  D. Klahr,et al.  The representation of children's knowledge. , 1978, Advances in child development and behavior.

[5]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[6]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[7]  A. Diamond,et al.  Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants' performance on AB. , 1985, Child development.

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[10]  James L. McClelland Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Cognition and Development , 1988 .

[11]  S. Vrana,et al.  Letters from the heart: Affective categorization of letter combinations in typists and nontypists. , 1990 .

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[13]  James L. McClelland Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Giacomo Mauro DAriano Advances in child development and behavior. , 1991, Advances in child development and behavior.

[15]  Javier R. Movellan,et al.  Benefits of gain: speeded learning and minimal hidden layers in back-propagation networks , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  J. Elman Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, And Grammatical Structure , 1991 .

[17]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[18]  James L. McClelland Toward a theory of information processing in graded, random, and interactive networks , 1993 .

[19]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[20]  G. Rizzolatti Nonconscious motor images , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  The mental and the neural: Psychological and neural studies of mental rotation and memory scanning , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Jeannerod Mental imagery in the motor context , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[24]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  An experimental test of rule-like network performance , 1996 .

[26]  J. Decety The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[27]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  On the Validity of Simulating Stagewise Development by Means of PDP Networks: Application of Catastrophe Analysis and an Experimental Test of Rule-Like Network Performance , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  Statistical Test of the Rule Assessment Methodology by Latent Class Analysis , 1997 .

[29]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  M. Raijmakers Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. , 1997 .

[31]  Yuko Munakata,et al.  Perseverative reaching in infancy: The roles of hidden toys and motor history in the AB task , 1997 .

[32]  Y. Munakata Infant perseveration and implications for object permanence theories: A PDP model of the AB task , 1998 .

[33]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Motor processes in mental rotation , 1998, Cognition.

[34]  G. O'Brien,et al.  A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Knowing in the context of acting: the task dynamics of the A-not-B error. , 1999, Psychological review.

[36]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Visuomotor neurons: ambiguity of the discharge or 'motor' perception? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[38]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The Morton-Massaro law of information integration: implications for models of perception. , 2001, Psychological review.

[39]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  Evidence for the Phase Transition from Rule I to Rule II on the Balance Scale Task , 2001 .

[40]  E. Thelen,et al.  The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[42]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  Modeling developmental transitions on the balance scale task , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  E. Thelen,et al.  Connectionism and dynamic systems: are they really different? , 2003 .

[44]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Different is good: connectionism and dynamic systems theory are complementary emergentist approaches to development , 2003 .

[45]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Development: it's about time , 2003 .

[46]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Connectionist models of development , 2003 .

[47]  Martin Redington,et al.  Modelling Atypical Syntax Processing , 2004 .

[48]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Toward a theory of information processing , 2007, Signal Process..

[49]  Brenda R. J. Jansen,et al.  Re-thinking stages of cognitive development: An appraisal of connectionist models of the balance scale task , 2007, Cognition.

[50]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  Computational Modeling in Developmental Psychology , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[51]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Critical periods and catastrophic interference effects in the development of self-organizing feature maps. , 2008, Developmental science.

[52]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Connectionist models of cognition. , 2008 .

[53]  Maartje E. J. Raijmakers,et al.  Transitions in cognitive development: prospects and limitations of a neural dynamic approach , 2009 .

[54]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A connectionist model of a continuous developmental transition in the balance scale task , 2009, Cognition.

[55]  The Robot as a New Frontier for Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory , 2009 .

[56]  Daniela Corbetta Brain, Body, and Mind: Lessons from Infant Motor Development , 2009 .

[57]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Connectionist Models of Development: Mechanistic Dynamical Models with Emergent Dynamical Properties , 2009 .

[58]  Are Dynamic Systems and Connectionist Approaches an Alternative to Good Old-Fashioned Cognitive Development? , 2009 .

[59]  Linda B. Smith Dynamic Systems, Sensorimotor Processes, and the Origins of Stability and Flexibility , 2009 .

[60]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Toward a New Grand Theory of Development? Connectionism and Dynamic Systems Theory Reconsidered , 2009 .

[61]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Development as Change of System Dynamics: Stability, Instability, and Emergence , 2009 .