Bounded Seed-AGI

Four principal features of autonomous control systems are left both unaddressed and unaddressable by present-day engineering methodologies: (1) The ability to operate effectively in environments that are only partially known at design time; (2) A level of generality that allows a system to re-assess and re-define the fulfillment of its mission in light of unexpected constraints or other unforeseen changes in the environment; (3) The ability to operate effectively in environments of significant complexity; and (4) The ability to degrade gracefully—how it can continue striving to achieve its main goals when resources become scarce, or in light of other expected or unexpected constraining factors that impede its progress. We describe new methodological and engineering principles for addressing these shortcomings, that we have used to design a machine that becomes increasingly better at behaving in underspecified circumstances, in a goal-directed way, on the job, by modeling itself and its environment as experience accumulates. The work provides an architectural blueprint for constructing systems with high levels of operational autonomy in underspecified circumstances, starting from only a small amount of designer-specified code—a seed. Using value-driven dynamic priority scheduling to control the parallel execution of a vast number of lines of reasoning, the system accumulates increasingly useful models of its experience, resulting in recursive self-improvement that can be autonomously sustained after the machine leaves the lab, within the boundaries imposed by its designers. A prototype system named AERA has been implemented and demonstrated to learn a complex real-world task—real-time multimodal dialogue with humans—by on-line observation. Our work presents solutions to several challenges that must be solved for achieving artificial general intelligence.

[1]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Bounded Recursive Self-Improvement , 2013, ArXiv.

[2]  Carlos Hernández,et al.  Towards Architectural Foundations for Cognitive Self-aware Systems , 2012, BICA.

[3]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Resource-Bounded Machines are Motivated to be Effective, Efficient, and Curious , 2013, AGI.

[4]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Achieving Artificial General Intelligence Through Peewee Granularity , 2009 .

[5]  Kristinn R. Thórisson From Constructionist to Constructivist A.I , 2009, AAAI Fall Symposium: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures.

[6]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Self-Programming: Operationalizing Autonomy , 2009 .

[7]  Pei Wang,et al.  THE ASSUMPTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND RESOURCES IN MODELS OF RATIONALITY , 2011 .

[8]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  Holistic Intelligence: Transversal Skills & Current Methodologies , 2009 .

[9]  Ben Goertzel,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Artificial General Intelligence , 2012, Atlantis Thinking Machines.

[10]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[11]  Roberto Pirrone,et al.  Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2012 - Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the BICA Society, Palermo, Sicily, Italy, October 31 - November 3, 2012 , 2012, BICA.

[12]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  A New Constructivist AI: From Manual Methods to Self-Constructive Systems , 2012 .

[13]  E. W. Adams,et al.  Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting , 1962 .