Probabilistic forecasts for the 2018 FIFA World Cup based on the bookmaker consensus model

Football fans worldwide anticipate the 2018 FIFA World Cup that will take place in Russia from 14 June to 15 July 2018. 32 of the best teams from 5 confederations compete to determine the new World Champion. Using a consensus model based on quoted odds from 26 bookmakers and betting exchanges a probabilistic forecast for the outcome of the World Cup is obtained. The favorite is Brazil with a forecasted winning probability of 16.6%, closely followed by the defending World Champion and 2017 FIFA Confederations Cup winner Germany with a winning probability of 15.8%. Two other teams also have winning probabilities above 10%: Spain and France with 12.5% and 12.1%, respectively. The results from this bookmaker consensus model are coupled with simulations of the entire tournament to obtain implied abilities for each team. These allow to obtain pairwise probabilities for each possible game along with probabilities for each team to proceed to the various stages of the tournament. This shows that indeed the most likely final is a match of the top favorites Brazil and Germany (with a probability of 5.5%) where Brazil has the chance to compensate the dramatic semifinal in Belo Horizonte, four years ago. However, given that it comes to this final, the chances are almost even (50.6% for Brazil vs. 49.4% for Germany). The most likely semifinals are between the four top teams, i.e., with a probability of 9.4% Brazil and France meet in the first semifinal (with chances slightly in favor of Brazil in such a match, 53.5%) and with 9.2% Germany and Spain play the second semifinal (with chances slightly in favor of Germany with 53.1%). These probabilistic forecasts have been obtained by suitably averaging the quoted winning odds for all teams across bookmakers. More precisely, the odds are first adjusted for the bookmakers' profit margins ("overrounds"), averaged on the log-odds scale, and then transformed back to winning probabilities. Moreover, an "inverse" approach to simulating the tournament yields estimated team abilities (or strengths) from which probabilities for all possible pairwise matches can be derived. This technique (Leitner, Zeileis, and Hornik 2010a) correctly predicted the winner of 2010 FIFA World Cup (Leitner, Zeileis, and Hornik 2010b) and three out of four semifinalists at the 2014 FIFA World Cup (Zeileis, Leitner, and Hornik 2014). Interactive web graphics for this report are available at: https://eeecon.uibk.ac.at/~zeileis/news/fifa2018/

[1]  M. Geiger,et al.  The role of correlation in two-asset games: Some experimental evidence , 2017 .

[2]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Forecasting sports tournaments by ratings of (prob)abilities: A comparison for the EURO 2008 , 2010 .

[3]  S. Renes,et al.  Fairness views and political preferences - Evidence from a large online experiment , 2017 .

[4]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Distributional regression forests for probabilistic precipitation forecasting in complex terrain , 2018, The Annals of Applied Statistics.

[5]  Gerhard Tutz,et al.  Prediction of major international soccer tournaments based on team-specific regularized Poisson regression: An application to the FIFA World Cup 2014 , 2015 .

[6]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Predictive Bookmaker Consensus Model for the UEFA Euro 2016 , 2016 .

[7]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Home victory for Brazil in the 2014 FIFA World Cup , 2014 .

[8]  Susanne Pech,et al.  The effect of statutory sick-pay on workers' labor supply and subsequent health , 2017 .

[9]  Simon Czermak,et al.  Incentives for Dishonesty: An Experimental Study with Internal Auditors , 2017, Economic Inquiry.

[10]  R. A. Bradley,et al.  Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons , 1952 .

[11]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Various versatile variances : An object-oriented implementation of clustered covariances in R Working , 2017 .

[12]  Robert Simmons,et al.  Odds setters as forecasters: the case of English football , 2005 .

[13]  U. Weitzel,et al.  Delegated Decision Making and Social Competition in the Finance Industry , 2018 .

[14]  A. Elo The rating of chessplayers, past and present , 1978 .

[15]  Helena Fornwagner Incentives to lose revisited: The NHL and its tournament incentives , 2019 .

[16]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Probabilistic Nowcasting of Low-Visibility Procedure States at Vienna International Airport During Cold Season , 2019, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[17]  Nikolaus Umlauf,et al.  A primer on Bayesian distributional regression , 2018 .

[18]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  BAMLSS: Bayesian Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (and Beyond) , 2018, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics.

[19]  M. Sutter,et al.  How Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Tournaments Affect Gender Differences in Competitive Behavior , 2017, European Economic Review.

[20]  R. J. Henery Measures of over-round in performance index betting , 1999 .

[21]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Anchor point selection: An approach for anchoring without anchor items , 2018 .

[22]  M. Halla,et al.  Parental Leave, (In)formal Childcare, and Long-Term Child Outcomes , 2017, The Journal of Human Resources.

[23]  A. Zeileis,et al.  Skewed logistic distribution for statistical temperature post-processing in mountainous areas , 2019, Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography.

[24]  Christopher Kah,et al.  rs – G E P GEP 2018 – 01 Pairwise stable matching in large economies , 2018 .

[25]  G. Schauberger,et al.  Predicting matches in international football tournaments with random forests , 2018, Statistical Modelling.

[26]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  History Repeating: Spain Beats Germany in the EURO 2012 Final , 2012 .

[27]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Hourly probabilistic snow forecasts over complex terrain: a hybrid ensemble postprocessing approach , 2018, Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography.

[28]  S. Lang,et al.  Modelling Under-Five Mortality through Multilevel Structured Additive Regression with Varying Coefficients for Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa , 2020, The Journal of Development Studies.

[29]  R. Kerschbamer,et al.  Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample , 2020 .

[30]  Florian Lindner Choking under pressure of top performers: Evidence from Biathlon competitions , 2017 .

[31]  S. Lang,et al.  Selective mortality and undernutrition in low- and middle-income countries , 2017 .

[32]  Daniel Müller,et al.  The anatomy of distributional preferences with group identity , 2019, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[33]  Lionel Page,et al.  Can a Common Currency Foster a Shared Social Identity across Different Nations? The Case of the Euro , 2017 .

[34]  Duc Tran Huy,et al.  The acceptance of a protected area and the benefits of sustainable tourism: In search of the weak link in their relationship , 2017 .

[35]  Nikolaus Umlauf,et al.  Nonlinear association structures in flexible Bayesian additive joint models , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[36]  Rudolf Kerschbamer,et al.  Do altruists lie less? , 2017, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[37]  M. Halla,et al.  Economic Origins of Cultural Norms: The Case of Animal Husbandry and Bastardy , 2017, European Economic Review.

[38]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Who is Going to Win the EURO 2008? A Statistical Investigation of Bookmakers Odds. , 2008 .

[39]  M. Halla,et al.  The Intergenerational Causal Effect of Tax Evasion: Evidence from the Commuter Tax Allowance in Austria , 2017, Journal of the European Economic Association.