Supporting Competency Development in Informal Workplace Learning

This paper seeks to suggest ways to support informal, self-directed, work-integrated learning within organizations. We focus on a special type of learning in organizations, namely on competency development, that is a purposeful development of employee capabilities to perform well in a large array of situations. As competency development is inherently a self-directed development activity, we seek to support these activities primarily in an informal learning context. AD-HOC environments which allow employees context specific access to documents in a knowledge repository have been suggested to support learning in the workplace. In this paper, we suggest to use the competence performance framework as a means to enhance the capabilities of AD HOC environments to support competency development. The framework formalizes the tasks employees are working in and the competencies needed to perform the tasks. Relating tasks and competencies results in a competence performance structure, which structures both tasks and competencies in terms of learning prerequisites. We conclude with two scenarios that make use of methods established in informal learning research. The scenarios show how competence performance structures enhance feedback mechanisms in a coaching process between supervisor and employee and provide assistance for self directed learning from a knowledge repository.

[1]  Daniel R. Tobin.  All Learning Is Self-Directed: How Organizations Can Support and Encourage Independent Learning , 2000 .

[2]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Kompetenz-Management : wie Individuen und Organisationen Kompetenz entwickeln , 2000 .

[3]  Bernhard Ganter,et al.  Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations , 1998 .

[4]  Noel T. Dickover.  The Job Is the Learning Environment: Performance-Centered Learning To Support Knowledge Worker Performance. , 2002 .

[5]  Tobias Ley,et al.  Achieving benefits through integrating eLearning and Strategic Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[6]  Tobias Ley,et al.  Identifying Employee Competencies in Dynamic Work Domains: Methodological Considerations and a Case Study , 2003, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[7]  Jörgen Sandberg.  Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach , 2000 .

[8]  Thomas J. Conlon,et al.  A review of informal learning literature, theory and implications for practice in developing global professional competence , 2004 .

[9]  Robert E. Haskell.  Reengineering Corporate Training: Intellectual Capital and Transfer of Learning , 1998 .

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[11]  Stefanie Lindstaedt.  Integration von Arbeits- und Lernprozessen , 2002 .

[12]  Martin Wessner,et al.  CSCL-Kompendium. Lehr- und Handbuch zum computerunterstützten kooperativen Lernen , 2004, CSCL-Kompendium.

[13]  Ulrich Reimer,et al.  Ontology-Based Skills Management: Goals, Opportunities and Challenges , 2002, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[14]  Stephen Hackett.  Educating for competency and reflective practice: fostering a conjoint approach in education and training , 2001 .

[15]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[16]  Gerhard Reutter.  Kriegesmann, Bernd; Staudt, Erich: Weiterbildung: Ein Mythos zerbricht. Der Widerspuch zwischen überzogenen Erwartungen und Misserfolgen der Weiterbildung. 1999. Rezension , 2000 .

[17]  Janine Swaak,et al.  Converging Knowledge Management, Training and e-learning: Scenarios to Make it Work , 2003, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..