Evaluating the automated alignment of 3D human body scans

The statistical analysis of large corpora of human body scans requires that these scans be in alignment, either for a small set of key landmarks or densely for all the vertices in the scan. Existing techniques tend to rely on hand-placed landmarks or algorithms that extract landmarks from scans. The former is time consuming and subjective while the latter is error prone. Here we show that a model-based approach can align meshes automatically, producing alignment accuracy similar to that of previous methods that rely on many landmarks. Specifically, we align a low-resolution, artist- created template body mesh to many high-resolution laser scans. Our alignment procedure employs a robust iterative closest point method with a regularization that promotes smooth and locally rigid deformation of the template mesh. We evaluate our approach on 50 female body models from the CAESAR dataset that vary significantly in body shape. To make the method fully automatic, we define simple feature detectors for the head and ankles, which provide initial landmark locations. We find that, if body poses are fairly similar, as in CAESAR, the fully automated method provides dense alignments that enable statistical analysis and anthropometric measurement.

[1]  Marc Alexa,et al.  As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling , 2007, Symposium on Geometry Processing.

[2]  Vladimir G. Kim,et al.  Blended intrinsic maps , 2011, SIGGRAPH 2011.

[3]  Jacques Feldmar,et al.  Rigid and Affine Registration of Smooth Surfaces using Differential Properties , 1994, ECCV.

[4]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Non-Rigid Registration Under Isometric Deformations , 2008 .

[5]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Head shop: generating animated head models with anatomical structure , 2002, SCA '02.

[6]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Home 3D body scans from noisy image and range data , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[7]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  The Correlated Correspondence Algorithm for Unsupervised Registration of Nonrigid Surfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[8]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Shape- and Pose-Invariant Correspondences Using Probabilistic Geodesic Surface Embedding , 2011, DAGM-Symposium.

[9]  Prosenjit Bose,et al.  Posture Invariant Correspondence of Incomplete Triangular Manifolds , 2007, Int. J. Shape Model..

[10]  Marc Rioux,et al.  Analysis of human shape variation using volumetric techniques , 2004 .

[11]  Chang Shu,et al.  Automatic Locating of Anthropometric Landmarks on 3D Human Models , 2006, Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission (3DPVT'06).

[12]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Matching 3-D anatomical surfaces with non-rigid deformations using octree-splines , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis.

[13]  Kathleen M. Robinette,et al.  Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR), Final Report. Volume 1. Summary , 2002 .

[14]  Zoran Popovic,et al.  The space of human body shapes: reconstruction and parameterization from range scans , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[15]  Hein A.M. Daanen,et al.  Automatic feature detection in 3D human body scans , 2004 .

[16]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  A Gromov-Hausdorff Framework with Diffusion Geometry for Topologically-Robust Non-rigid Shape Matching , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[17]  Stuart Geman,et al.  Statistical methods for tomographic image reconstruction , 1987 .

[18]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm , 2001, Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling.

[19]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Yun-Ja Nam,et al.  Automatic body landmark identification for various body figures , 2011 .

[21]  Chara Lewis,et al.  2nd International Conference on 3D Body Scanning Technologies , 2011 .

[22]  Marc Rioux,et al.  Characterizing human shape variation using 3D anthropometric data , 2006, The Visual Computer.