Improved change detection with local co-registration adjustments

We introduce a simple approach to compensate for the effects of residual misregistration on the performance of anomalous change detection algorithms. Using real data, both within a simulation framework for anomalous changes, and with a real anomalous change, we illustrate the approach and investigate its effectiveness.

[1]  Alan A. Stocker,et al.  Advanced algorithms for autonomous hyperspectral change detection , 2004, 33rd Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR'04).

[2]  Neal R. Harvey,et al.  Simulation framework for spatio-spectral anomalous change detection , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  James Theiler,et al.  Proposed Framework for Anomalous Change Detection , 2006 .

[4]  A. Schaum,et al.  Linear chromodynamics models for hyperspectral target detection , 2003, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).

[5]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[6]  Chris Clifton Change Detection in Overhead Imagery Using Neural Networks , 2004, Applied Intelligence.

[7]  James Theiler,et al.  Quantitative comparison of quadratic covariance-based anomalous change detectors. , 2008, Applied optics.

[8]  Knut Conradsen,et al.  Multivariate Alteration Detection (MAD) and MAF Postprocessing in Multispectral, Bitemporal Image Data: New Approaches to Change Detection Studies , 1998 .

[9]  James Theiler,et al.  Sensitivity of anomalous change detection to small misregistration errors , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Wallace M. Porter,et al.  The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS) , 1993 .

[11]  Joseph Meola,et al.  Airborne hyperspectral detection of small changes. , 2008, Applied optics.

[12]  Michael T. Eismann,et al.  Image misregistration effects on hyperspectral change detection , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.