Exploring the impact of resource limitations on gene network reconstruction

The characterization of biological networks via mathematical models often involves cycles of experimental perturbations and measurements, followed by the use of a network inference method. Here we study an engineered genetic circuit, introduced in a recent paper by the authors, and report additional analysis and interpretation. Using this synthetic network as a benchmark, we find that the application of the modular response analysis (MRA) network inference method leads to the discovery of a hidden, nontrivial “ghost” regulatory edge, which was not explicitly engineered into the network. Importantly, this result is not evident from direct inspection of the experimental measurements and global response coefficients. To probe the global to local conversion in MRA, we use conditionally randomized global response matrices to obtain distributions of local response coefficients and demonstrate that sign changes are numerically possible. Additionally, using simulations of a cascade network in a biochemical setting which does not take into account resource limitations, we show that MRA cannot return “ghost” edges, which points to the impact of the cellular milieu and in particular the use of shared resources. Taking resource availability into account during reverse engineering may allow for closer approximation of the cellular environment and points to a potential opportunity for network characterization strategies.

[1]  Eduardo D Sontag,et al.  Network reconstruction based on steady-state data. , 2008, Essays in biochemistry.

[2]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Computational Approaches for Analyzing Information Flow in Biological Networks , 2012, Science Signaling.

[3]  E. Furlong,et al.  Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  D. Floreano,et al.  Revealing strengths and weaknesses of methods for gene network inference , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  G. Stan,et al.  Overloaded and stressed: whole-cell considerations for bacterial synthetic biology. , 2016, Current opinion in microbiology.

[6]  Muriel Médard,et al.  Network deconvolution as a general method to distinguish direct dependencies in networks , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Y. Rondelez Competition for catalytic resources alters biological network dynamics. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[9]  J. Collins,et al.  Size matters: network inference tackles the genome scale , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  D. Bernardo,et al.  A Yeast Synthetic Network for In Vivo Assessment of Reverse-Engineering and Modeling Approaches , 2009, Cell.

[11]  Barbara M. Bakker,et al.  How Molecular Competition Influences Fluxes in Gene Expression Networks , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Translational cross talk in gene networks. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Generating Realistic In Silico Gene Networks for Performance Assessment of Reverse Engineering Methods , 2009, J. Comput. Biol..

[14]  D. Tollervey,et al.  The Many Pathways of RNA Degradation , 2009, Cell.

[15]  Zhen Xie,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology Peer Review Process File Synthetic Incoherent Feed-forward Circuits Show Adaptation to the Amount of Their Genetic Template. Transaction Report , 2022 .

[16]  Yi Li,et al.  Discriminating direct and indirect connectivities in biological networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Effective interaction graphs arising from resource limitations in gene networks , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).

[18]  Nima Abedpour,et al.  Resource constrained flux balance analysis predicts selective pressure on the global structure of metabolic networks , 2015, BMC Systems Biology.

[19]  J. Collins,et al.  Inferring Genetic Networks and Identifying Compound Mode of Action via Expression Profiling , 2003, Science.

[20]  Yi Li,et al.  Synthetic mammalian transgene negative autoregulation , 2013 .

[21]  A. Arkin,et al.  Contextualizing context for synthetic biology – identifying causes of failure of synthetic biological systems , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[22]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Regulation of Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes: Mechanisms and Biological Targets , 2009, Cell.

[23]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  Michael Margaliot,et al.  A model for competition for ribosomes in the cell , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[25]  Zhen Xie,et al.  Reverse engineering validation using a benchmark synthetic gene circuit in human cells. , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[26]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Mario di Bernardo,et al.  Analysis, design and implementation of a novel scheme for in-vivo control of synthetic gene regulatory networks , 2011, Autom..