Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images

The maximum intensity projection (MIP) is a popularly used algorithm for display of MRA images, but its performance has not been rigorously analyzed before. In this paper, four measures are proposed for the performance of the MIP algorithm and the quality of images projected from three-dimensional (3-D) data, which are vessel voxel projection probability, vessel detection probability, false vessel probability, and vessel-tissue contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). As side products, vessel-missing probability, vessel receiver operating characteristics (ROC's), and mean number of false vessels are also studied. Based on the assumptions that the intensities of vessel, tissue, and noise along a projection path are independent Gaussian, these measures are derived and obtained all in closed forms. All the measures are functions of explicit parameters: vessel-to-tissue noise ratio (VTNR) and CNR of 3 D data prior to the MIP, vessel diameter, and projection length. It is shown that the MIP algorithm increases the CNR of large vessels whose CNR prior to the MIP is high and whose diameters are large. The increase in CNR increases with projection path length. On the other hand, all the proposed measures indicate that the small vessels that have low CNR prior to the MIP and small diameters suffer from the MIP. The performance gets worse as projection path length increases. All measures demonstrate a better performance when the vessel diameter is larger. Other properties and possible applications of the derived measures are also discussed.

[1]  M. Giger,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. , 1984, Medical physics.

[2]  A. Burgess Statistically defined backgrounds: performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  H H Barrett,et al.  Ideal versus human observer for long-tailed point spread functions: does deconvolution help? , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[5]  A. Burgess Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[6]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[7]  L B Lusted,et al.  Radiographic applications of signal detection theory. , 1972, Radiology.

[8]  G T Gullberg,et al.  MR vascular imaging with a fast gradient refocusing pulse sequence and reformatted images from transaxial sections. , 1987, Radiology.

[9]  H. Barrett,et al.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[11]  E M Haacke,et al.  Gadolinium‐enhanced high‐resolution MR angiography with adaptive vessel tracking: Preliminary results in the intracranial circulation , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images. , 1977, Medical physics.

[14]  P. J. Keller,et al.  MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Work in progress. , 1989, Radiology.

[15]  William K. Pratt,et al.  Digital image processing (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[16]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  D L Parker,et al.  Vessel enhancement filtering in three‐dimensional MR angiography , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images. , 1986, Medical physics.

[19]  Valentín Chapter 4. , 1998, Annals of the ICRP.

[20]  Donna G. Brown,et al.  Contrast‐to‐noise ratios in maximum intensity projection images , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Statistical Efficiency Of Perceptual Decisions , 1984, Other Conferences.

[23]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part I: Noiseless images. , 1974, Medical physics.

[24]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  P F Judy,et al.  LESION DETECTION AND SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IN CT IMAGES , 1981, Medical physics.

[26]  K Doi,et al.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  J Hale,et al.  An Algorithm for MR Angiography Image Enhancement , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Toward a unified view of radiological imaging systems. Part II: Noisy images , 1974 .

[29]  G Laub,et al.  Displays for MR angiography , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Yi Sun,et al.  Small vessel enhancement in MRA images using local maximum mean processing , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[31]  P. Guignard,et al.  A comparative method based on ROC analysis for the quantitation of observer performance in scintigraphy. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[33]  H H Barrett,et al.  Null functions and eigenfunctions: tools for the analysis of imaging systems. , 1991, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[34]  H. Barlow The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[35]  Yiping Peter Du Improvement of Small Vessel Visibility in Three - Time-Of Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1995 .

[36]  H H Barrett,et al.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.