Speeding-Up Pittsburgh Learning Classifier Systems: Modeling Time and Accuracy
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jaume Bacardit,et al. Comparison of training set reduction techniques for Pittsburgh approach Genetic Classifier Systems , 2003 .
[2] Elisabet Golobardes,et al. Hybrid Deletion Policies for Case Base Maintenance , 2003, FLAIRS Conference.
[3] David E. Goldberg,et al. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .
[4] Stewart W. Wilson. Classifier Fitness Based on Accuracy , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.
[5] Catherine Blake,et al. UCI Repository of machine learning databases , 1998 .
[6] Stephen F. Smith,et al. Flexible Learning of Problem Solving Heuristics Through Adaptive Search , 1983, IJCAI.
[7] Terence Soule,et al. Effects of Code Growth and Parsimony Pressure on Populations in Genetic Programming , 1998, Evolutionary Computation.
[8] Jaume Bacardit,et al. Bloat Control and Generalization Pressure Using the Minimum Description Length Principle for a Pittsburgh Approach Learning Classifier System , 2005, IWLCS.
[9] Jaume Bacardit,et al. Evolving Multiple Discretizations with Adaptive Intervals for a Pittsburgh Rule-Based Learning Classifier System , 2003, GECCO.
[10] Ronald L. Rivest,et al. Learning decision lists , 2004, Machine Learning.
[11] Johannes Fürnkranz,et al. Integrative Windowing , 1998, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[12] K. De Jong,et al. Using Genetic Algorithms for Concept Learning , 2004, Machine Learning.
[13] Kenneth A. De Jong,et al. Using genetic algorithms for concept learning , 1993, Machine Learning.
[14] John H. Holland,et al. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .
[15] Christophe G. Giraud-Carrier,et al. A Note on the Utility of Incremental Learning , 2000, AI Commun..