Predicting Communication Intention in Social Networks

In social networks, where users send messages to each other, the issue of what triggers communication between unrelated users arises: does communication between previously unrelated users depend on friend-of-a-friend type of relationships, common interests, or other factors? In this work, we study the problem of predicting directed communication intention between two users. Link prediction is similar to communication intention in that it uses network structure for prediction. However, these two problems exhibit fundamental differences that originate from their focus. Link prediction uses evidence to predict network structure evolution, whereas our focal point is directed communication initiation between users who are previously not structurally connected. To address this problem, we employ topological evidence in conjunction to transactional information in order to predict communication intention. It is not intuitive whether methods that work well for link prediction would work well in this case. In fact, we show in this work that network or content evidence, when considered separately, are not sufficiently accurate predictors. Our novel approach, which jointly considers local structural properties of users in a social network, in conjunction with their generated content, captures numerous interactions, direct and indirect, social and contextual, which have up to date been considered independently. We performed an empirical study to evaluate our method using an extracted network of directed @-messages sent between users of a corporate micro logging service, which resembles Twitter. We find that our method outperforms state of the art techniques for link prediction. Our findings have implications for a wide range of social web applications, such as contextual expert recommendation for Q&A, new friendship relationships creation, and targeted content delivery.

[1]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks , 2010, WSDM '11.

[2]  Peter Mika Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics , 2005, International Semantic Web Conference.

[3]  David Liben-Nowell,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007 .

[4]  James Allan,et al.  Text classification and named entities for new event detection , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[5]  Mohammad Al Hasan,et al.  Link prediction using supervised learning , 2006 .

[6]  Mo Chen,et al.  Clustering via Random Walk Hitting Time on Directed Graphs , 2008, AAAI.

[7]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Non-Conservative Diffusion and its Application to Social Network Analysis , 2011, ArXiv.

[8]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Measuring and extracting proximity graphs in networks , 2007, TKDD.

[9]  Marwan Bikdash,et al.  Node-Pair Feature Extraction for Link Prediction , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[10]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[11]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Rami Puzis,et al.  Link Prediction in Social Networks Using Computationally Efficient Topological Features , 2011, 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing.

[13]  Ido Guy,et al.  Digital Traces of Interest: Deriving Interest Relationships from Social Media Interactions , 2011, ECSCW.

[14]  Jiawei Han,et al.  A Unified Framework for Link Recommendation Using Random Walks , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.

[15]  Munmun De Choudhury,et al.  Contextual Prediction of Communication Flow in Social Networks , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07).

[16]  Qi He,et al.  TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers , 2010, WSDM '10.

[17]  Hisashi Kashima,et al.  A Parameterized Probabilistic Model of Network Evolution for Supervised Link Prediction , 2006, Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06).

[18]  Jérôme Kunegis,et al.  Learning spectral graph transformations for link prediction , 2009, ICML '09.

[19]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Evaluating similarity measures for emergent semantics of social tagging , 2009, WWW '09.

[20]  Luís Sarmento,et al.  Characterization of the twitter @replies network: are user ties social or topical? , 2010, SMUC '10.

[21]  Michael Wessel,et al.  Towards a Media Interpretation Framework for the Semantic Web , 2007 .

[22]  Hila Becker,et al.  Learning similarity metrics for event identification in social media , 2010, WSDM '10.

[23]  Mor Naaman,et al.  HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[24]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  Folks in Folksonomies: social link prediction from shared metadata , 2010, WSDM '10.

[25]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[26]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Semantic Grounding of Tag Relatedness in Social Bookmarking Systems , 2008, SEMWEB.

[27]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey , 2010, ArXiv.

[28]  Lyle H. Ungar,et al.  Statistical Relational Learning for Link Prediction , 2003 .

[29]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Finding your friends and following them to where you are , 2012, WSDM '12.

[30]  Lexing Xie,et al.  Modeling personal and social network context for event annotation in images , 2007, JCDL '07.

[31]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Models of Text Document Similarity , 2005 .

[32]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites , 2009, CHI.

[33]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..