Unified framework for information integration based on information geometry

Significance Measuring the degree of causal influences among multiple elements of a system is a fundamental problem in physics and biology. We propose a unified framework for quantifying any combination of causal relationships between elements in a hierarchical manner based on information geometry. Our measure of integration, called geometrical integrated information, quantifies the strength of multiple causal influences among elements by projecting the probability distribution of a system onto a constrained manifold. This measure overcomes mathematical problems of existing measures and enables an intuitive understanding of the relationships between integrated information and other measures of causal influence such as transfer entropy. Inspired by the integration of neural activity in consciousness studies, our measure should have general utility in analyzing complex systems. Assessment of causal influences is a ubiquitous and important subject across diverse research fields. Drawn from consciousness studies, integrated information is a measure that defines integration as the degree of causal influences among elements. Whereas pairwise causal influences between elements can be quantified with existing methods, quantifying multiple influences among many elements poses two major mathematical difficulties. First, overestimation occurs due to interdependence among influences if each influence is separately quantified in a part-based manner and then simply summed over. Second, it is difficult to isolate causal influences while avoiding noncausal confounding influences. To resolve these difficulties, we propose a theoretical framework based on information geometry for the quantification of multiple causal influences with a holistic approach. We derive a measure of integrated information, which is geometrically interpreted as the divergence between the actual probability distribution of a system and an approximated probability distribution where causal influences among elements are statistically disconnected. This framework provides intuitive geometric interpretations harmonizing various information theoretic measures in a unified manner, including mutual information, transfer entropy, stochastic interaction, and integrated information, each of which is characterized by how causal influences are disconnected. In addition to the mathematical assessment of consciousness, our framework should help to analyze causal relationships in complex systems in a complete and hierarchical manner.

[1]  Marco Cuturi,et al.  Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transport , 2013, NIPS.

[2]  D. di Bernardo,et al.  How to infer gene networks from expression profiles , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Information Sharing in the Brain Indexes Consciousness in Noncommunicative Patients , 2013, Current Biology.

[4]  G. Tononi,et al.  Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[6]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[7]  Ay Nihat,et al.  Information Geometry on Complexity and Stochastic Interaction , 2001 .

[8]  Andrea Pigorini,et al.  Multivariate autoregressive models with exogenous inputs for intracerebral responses to direct electrical stimulation of the human brain , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  Jacques Loeb,et al.  The Biological Bulletin , 1900, The American Naturalist.

[11]  M. Handzic 5 , 1824, The Banality of Heidegger.

[12]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Measuring consciousness in severely damaged brains. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  George Sugihara,et al.  Detecting Causality in Complex Ecosystems , 2012, Science.

[14]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[15]  Giulio Tononi,et al.  Integrated Information in Discrete Dynamical Systems: Motivation and Theoretical Framework , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[17]  Max Tegmark,et al.  Improved Measures of Integrated Information , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Larissa Albantakis,et al.  From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0 , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  F. Opitz Information geometry and its applications , 2012, 2012 9th European Radar Conference.

[20]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[21]  C. Koch,et al.  Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  UnCheol Lee,et al.  Propofol induction reduces the capacity for neural information integration: Implications for the mechanism of consciousness and general anesthesia , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[23]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  O. Bagasra,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 1914, Science.

[25]  G. Tononi,et al.  Consciousness and Anesthesia , 2008, Science.

[26]  D. Chalmers Consciousness and Cognition , 1990 .

[27]  A. U.S.,et al.  Predictability , Complexity , and Learning , 2002 .

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Structural and Functional Brain Networks: From Connections to Cognition , 2013, Science.

[29]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , 2009 .

[30]  G. Tononi,et al.  A Theoretically Based Index of Consciousness Independent of Sensory Processing and Behavior , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[31]  N. Ay,et al.  A geometric approach to complexity. , 2011, Chaos.

[32]  Shun-ichi Amari,et al.  Methods of information geometry , 2000 .

[33]  L. Christophorou Science , 2018, Emerging Dynamics: Science, Energy, Society and Values.

[34]  C. Koch,et al.  Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  David K Campbell,et al.  Editorial: The pre-history of Chaos-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science. , 2015, Chaos.

[36]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Practical Measures of Integrated Information for Time-Series Data , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  G. Tononi,et al.  Breakdown of Cortical Effective Connectivity During Sleep , 2005, Science.

[38]  Toru Yanagawa,et al.  Measuring Integrated Information from the Decoding Perspective , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Current Biology , 2012, Current Biology.

[40]  A. Seth,et al.  Causal density and integrated information as measures of conscious level , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[41]  G. Tononi Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto , 2008, The Biological Bulletin.

[42]  C. Granger Some recent development in a concept of causality , 1988 .

[43]  A. Seth,et al.  Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Sosuke Ito,et al.  Information thermodynamics on causal networks. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[45]  J. Winn,et al.  Brain , 1878, The Lancet.

[46]  G. Tononi,et al.  Stimulus Set Meaningfulness and Neurophysiological Differentiation: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2014, bioRxiv.

[47]  Jennifer Neville,et al.  Modeling relationship strength in online social networks , 2010, WWW '10.

[48]  B. Pompe,et al.  Permutation entropy: a natural complexity measure for time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[49]  Daniel Polani,et al.  Information Flows in Causal Networks , 2008, Adv. Complex Syst..