Conditions that cause risk pooling to increase inventory

We say product A is a partial substitute for product B if a fraction of the customers who prefer B are willing to accept A when B is out of stock. When demand is uncertain, it is intuitive and true that a larger "willing to substitute" fraction implies larger expected profits. A higher "willing to substitute" fraction allows one to pool the risk of individual products. It may also be intuitive that a larger "willing to substitute" fraction might result in lower optimal total inventory. For the full substitution structure, several researchers have shown that for certain distributions such as the exponential, this latter intuition is not true. We show that this full substitution anomaly can occur with any right skewed demand distribution. We assume i.i.d. demand distributions unless we indicate otherwise. We also show that the anomaly can occur for a number of realistic situations of partial substitution with commonly used demand distributions such as Normal, exponential, Poisson, and uniform. We also demonstrate the anomaly for more than one period, with backlogging, lost sales, more than two products, and with setup costs.

[1]  Nils Rudi,et al.  Who Benefits from Transshipment? Exogenous vs. Endogenous Wholesale Prices , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Nils Rudi,et al.  Centralized and Competitive Inventory Models with Demand Substitution , 2002, Oper. Res..

[3]  Linus Schrage,et al.  “Centralized Ordering Policies in a Multi-Warehouse System with Lead Times and Random Demand” , 2004 .

[4]  G. D. Eppen Note---Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in a Multi-Location Newsboy Problem , 1979 .

[5]  Narendra Agrawal,et al.  Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand Substitution , 2000, Oper. Res..

[6]  S. Chopra,et al.  Managing Risk To Avoid Supply-Chain Breakdown , 2004 .

[7]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .

[8]  Gerhard O. Mensch,et al.  TIMS Studies in the management sciences : Burton V. Dean and Joel L. Goldhar (eds.), Management of Research and Innovation, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Vol. 15, 1980, 300 pp. , 1983 .

[9]  K. R. Baker,et al.  The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model , 1986 .

[10]  R. Ernst,et al.  The Effects of Selling Packaged Goods on Inventory Decisions , 1999 .

[11]  Jovan Grahovac,et al.  Sharing and Lateral Transshipment of Inventory in a Supply Chain with Expensive Low-Demand Items , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Philippe Jorion Value at Risk , 2001 .

[13]  Zvi Drezner,et al.  Optimal inventory policies for substitutable commodities with stochastic demand , 1991 .

[14]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[15]  M. Dada,et al.  Estimation of Consumer Demand with Stock-Out Based Substitution: An Application to Vending Machine Products , 1998 .

[16]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  Liquid asset allocation using "newsvendor" models with convex shortage costs , 1997 .

[17]  B. Tabrizi,et al.  Defining next-generation products: an inside look. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[18]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  Component commonality in assemble-to-order systems: Models and properties , 1989 .

[19]  E. Ignall,et al.  Optimality of Myopic Inventory Policies for Several Substitute Products , 1969 .

[20]  P. Jackson,et al.  Risk pooling in a two‐period, two‐echelon inventory stocking and allocation problem , 1989 .

[21]  E. Silver,et al.  Some Concepts For Inventory Control Under Substitutable Demand , 1978 .

[22]  Ram Akella,et al.  Single-Period Multiproduct Inventory Models with Substitution , 1999, Oper. Res..

[23]  Ravi Anupindi,et al.  Centralization of Stocks: Retailers Vs. Manufacturer , 1999 .

[24]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  On the Effect of Demand Randomness on Inventories and Costs , 1992, Oper. Res..

[25]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Reducing the Cost of Demand Uncertainty Through Accurate Response to Early Sales , 1996, Oper. Res..

[26]  Saif Benjaafar,et al.  On the Benefits of Pooling in Production-Inventory Systems , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Linus Schrage,et al.  OR Practice - A Scenario Approach to Capacity Planning , 1989, Oper. Res..

[28]  S. Karlin,et al.  Studies in the Mathematical Theory of Inventory and Production, by K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin, H. Scarf with contributions by M.J. Beckmann, J. Gessford, R.F. Muth. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press, 1958, X p.340p., $ 8.75. , 1959, Bulletin de l'Institut de recherches économiques et sociales.

[29]  Kumar Rajaram,et al.  The impact of product substitution on retail merchandising , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Stephen A. Smith,et al.  Estimating negative binomial demand for retail inventory management with unobservable lost sales , 1996 .

[31]  Garrett J. van Ryzin,et al.  Stocking Retail Assortments Under Dynamic Consumer Substitution , 2001, Oper. Res..