Load and Attentional Bayes

Selective attention is a most intensively studied psychological phenomenon, rife with theoretical suggestions and schisms. A critical idea is that of limited capacity, the allocation of which has produced continual conflict about such phenomena as early and late selection. An influential resolution of this debate is based on the notion of perceptual load (Lavie, 2005), which suggests that low-load, easy tasks, because they underuse the total capacity of attention, mandatorily lead to the processing of stimuli that are irrelevant to the current attentional set; whereas high-load, difficult tasks grab all resources for themselves, leaving distractors high and dry. We argue that this theory presents a challenge to Bayesian theories of attention, and suggest an alternative, statistical, account of key supporting data.

[1]  H. Pashler The Psychology of Attention , 1997 .

[2]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[6]  Laurent Itti,et al.  Optimal cue selection strategy , 2005, NIPS.

[7]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[9]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[10]  R. Zemel,et al.  Statistical models and sensory attention , 1999 .

[11]  C. Koch Strategies and Models of Selective Attention , 2010 .

[12]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Theoretical understanding of the early visual processes by data compression and data selection , 2006, Network.

[14]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[17]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Dynamics of attentional selection under conflict: toward a rational Bayesian account. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[19]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[20]  N. Lavie,et al.  Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  D. Long Probabilistic Models of the Brain. , 2002 .

[22]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[23]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[24]  A. Treisman Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[25]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[26]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Inference, Attention, and Decision in a Bayesian Neural Architecture , 2004, NIPS.

[27]  J. Palmer Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[28]  M Sahani,et al.  Attention resolves the effects of a computational bottleneck: modelling binding, precueing, and task-driven bias , 2008 .

[29]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Experience-Guided Search: A Theory of Attentional Control , 2007, NIPS.

[30]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[31]  D. G. MacKay Aspects of the Theory of Comprehension, Memory and Attention , 1973 .

[32]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[33]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Attending to multiple sources of information. I. The integration of information in decision making Volume 14, no. 3 (1982), by Marilyn L. Shaw, pages 353–409 , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.